The Governor said of the Tennessee Firearms Freedom Act that he let become law without signing:
This bill is not about firearms. It is about a fringe constitutional theory that I believe will be quickly dispensed with by the federal courts.
He calls federalism and the tenth amendment fringe and then proceeds to say:
While I share the General Assembly’s commitment to federalism, this legislation contravenes our Constitution.
ACK takes the governor to task on his inconsistency. And I agree. But I wonder why he did not veto it? Unless he realized how much damage was done when he broke a campaign promise and vetoed the guns in restaurants bill. Maybe he is considering further office in the state.