So, Macca was found to be a Brady Board Member. You can read about it here. Well, I should be clear. A lot of circumstantial evidence indicated who Macca likely was. And I’m torn between revealing that evidence or not. (ETA: reveal evidence not identity) Sure, I could (with Sebastian’s permission) state how but then others following in Macca’s steps would know how we (ETA: and by we, I mean Sebastian) did it.
Macca has now denied it. Macca claims we’re avoiding the issue by drawing attention Macca’s ties with the Brady Camp. I issued Macca a challenge:
you can post at my blog whenever you want. I’ll set you up as an author. You can make your case. I and my readers will make ours. Comments there will be welcomed.
I doubt Macca will take me up on it. And, boy, would that annoy readers.
Anyway, here’s some thoughts:
Macca may be denying it because Macca’s antics were not sanctioned by (or even known about by) the BC.
We’ve not publicly outed Macca for a few reasons and they are:
I don’t think outing people serves any particular purpose.
As someone who blogs pseudonymously, I can see why someone would. However, I don’t hold myself out as someone I am not.
If we outed Macca, there would be allegations of The Evil Gun Lobby picking on some poor activist.
The whole reasoned discourse series over at the Brady Blog was the justification for their shutting down comments.
We’ll probably see some press about how those poor, poor souls at the BC had to shut down comments because of the vile rhetoric and threats from the pro-gun side, what with all their facts and sources and stuff. They’ll cite the reasoned discourse series, even though those comments did not appear on the blog.
The BC has figured out how to turn off trackbacks now. Teehee. So much for that reasoned discourse, eh?
Switch roles for a moment and assume it was the NRA shutting down reasoned discourse. It’d get a write up in the NYT and the WaPo.
Update: BTW, in comments, Jared states that:
Kelli [the other anti-gun commenter at the Brady blog – ed] is exactly who she says she is. I’ve verified it through documentation available to me. I will not stand for her arguments but I will personally attest to her honesty in identifying herself to the extent that she has.
Good to know.