Ammo For Sale

« « Diversity | Home | Then and now » »

Was Roof a prohibited person?

The press was quick to repeat the lie that Roof got a gun via some loophole. Only if you think bureaucratic incompetence is a loophole.

And even that line may be in question.

More from David Hardy

3 Responses to “Was Roof a prohibited person?”

  1. Lyle Says:

    Doesn’t matter how he got it– Nothing he or anyone else does can alter or abolish a basic human right. That’s First Principle.

    Second Principle; the very idea of using restrictive laws to “keep guns out of the hands of criminals” is retarded from the outset, being that even under a total ban the outlaws will be the OLNY ONES who have guns.

    Pay attention to Fisrt Principles and the other stuff will fall into place all on its own.

  2. mikee Says:

    The focus on his background check is a misdirection. Again, it isn’t the gun, nor the ability to obtain the gun, that made Roof a mass murderer. It was Roof himself.

    Would there be less outrage if Roof had released the contents of a cylinder of chlorine gas stolen from a local swimming pool into the church? Or used a 5 gallon can of gasoline to burn it down with all occupants? Or used a length of rebar to bash heads into mush?

    The gun is not the issue. The killer is the issue, and the only real issue.

  3. KM Says:

    But if they focus on the gun, something they (wrongly) see as being able to ban/restrict/dispose of, they don’t have to come up with a solution for the crazy fucks.

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local
Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges


bisonAd

Categories

Archives