What’s need got to do with it?
NJ DA asks supreme court not to take the Drake case, the case about residents having to show a justifiable need to exercise their rights.
3 Responses to “What’s need got to do with it?”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
March 16th, 2014 at 6:28 pm
If the AG is so sure of his position, why not let the case proceed and settle the issue nationwide once and for all??
March 17th, 2014 at 8:23 am
If NJ wins, will the state start requiring a show of “need” to exercise, say, one’s religious beliefs?
Because a demonstration that my God is the one true God, and that my religious practices affect my soul’s fate in the afterlife, is something I am not prepared to provide to the New Jersey Religious Practices Licensing Board, without a bit more time and effort on my part.
But I bet the documentation required by NJ would be more than that required to achieve sainthood for Catholics.
March 17th, 2014 at 11:06 am
I agree with the DA.
The court might simply find the “legislation” unconstitutional and have it stricken, in toto.
Gavel down.