Bloomberg says he’ll outspend NRA

Well, good. He’ll be less wealthy and won’t have much to show for it.

Posted in uncategorized on March 16th, 2014 by SayUncle | RSS 2.0 |

chiefjaybob Says:
March 16th, 2014 at 1:55 pm
Hasn’t he been doing that, already? How’s that workin’ out for ya, Mikey?
Linoge Says:
March 16th, 2014 at 5:06 pm
I have nothing against a private individual doing his best to stimulate the economy; Lord knows our government is failing at it (not that it is their job, mind you, but they scream about it so incessantly).

I just wish he would find more constructive pursuits for his money. Oh well.
Patrick Says:
March 17th, 2014 at 7:39 am
He did that last election cycle and lost big time. If his bought lawmakers (Manchin/Toomey/etc) go down in flames and guns were part of the reason they took that fall, then his money literally becomes toxic. It will be s scarlet letter for swing-district lawmakers.

Bloomberg has but one weapon: his cash. The best thing that could happen is for him to use it and lose anyway.

Customary caveat: This is not forgone, so we need to keep working.
mikee Says:
March 17th, 2014 at 7:58 am
If his arguments were persuasive getting them accepted would not cost nearly as much as he is having to spend.
Jack Says:
March 17th, 2014 at 8:25 am
As someone else… (Weerd I think) pointed out.

If Bloomberg had more money AND public support then how does he lose?
Jeff Powell Says:
March 18th, 2014 at 9:55 am
He said “could” not “will”

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local
Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges

Categories