« « Gun rights bills gaining traction in congress | Home | Meanwhile, in Tennessee » »

6 Responses to “Ron Paul”

1. Gunmart Says:
   April 27th, 2011 at 9:22 am

   Ron Paul, Ralph Nader… who cares. He will only get 1.5% of the vote anyway, so it doesnt matter.

2. bwm Says:
   April 27th, 2011 at 9:51 am

   Gunmart,

   Have you seen the current crop of rino’s making noise to run in 2012? Pinning your hopes on “anyone but Obama”?

   Get ready for another 4 years.

3. Gunmart Says:
   April 27th, 2011 at 10:13 am

   I agree, they need an actual conservative who has some charisma to step up… but Ron Paul aint it.

   I know he has his passionate supporters, and I agree with about 90% of what he has to say…. but he aint even gonna come close to landing the nomination.

4. Rivrdog Says:
   April 27th, 2011 at 1:09 pm

   So, does this mean the army of Paulistas will be out in force again, making a mockery of free speech like they did last time, trying to shut down bloggers who say anything bad about SuperPaul.

   I could deal with the guy as President. It would take him about two nanoseconds to realize that none of the utopian Big L crap he’s spouted would EVER get by Congress, then he would have to settle down and be a statesman, and I think he has some statesman in him.

5. ATLien Says:
   April 27th, 2011 at 4:33 pm

   You mean that big L “following the Constitution” thing?

   If you think it’s Utopian crap, maybe you might want to GTFO. Go to Canada, where you don’t free speech.

6. Ron W Says:
   April 27th, 2011 at 4:40 pm

   I will vote for Ron Paul if he runs because of his message which is that our elected officials actually do what they are under orders to do by the Constitution. But he is not a very good messenger. Otherwise I will NOT waste my vote on Council on Foreign Relations puppets/agents (Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama who have and are working to treasonously turn us over to the global plantation owners.

   “Once the ruling members of the CFR shadow government have decided that the U.S. Government should adopt a particular policy, the very substantial research facilities of (the) CFR are put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy, and to confound and discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition.
   “The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence and submergence into an all powerful, one world government.” — Admiral Chester Ward, former CFR member and Judge Advocate General of the U.S. Navy

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges Your Location:

Categories

• ATF (769)
• Death Match (10)
• Eminent Domain (225)
• In the bag (9)
• Notes to Junior (546)
• Poker (74)
• Recipes (142)
• Shotgun Noob (11)
• The Airing of Grievances (19)
• uncategorized (47,725)

Archives

Select Month August 2023 June 2022 March 2022 December 2021 August 2021 February 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 October 1971