Judgemental
Tam is not impressed with the Smith and Wesson Judge clone being decked it out in lasers and stuff. I mean, it’s not like they’d make a tactical one.
And the Judge lever action? That one, though, is actually kinda cool.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
January 19th, 2011 at 10:43 am
The Judge carbines are nifty, but my interest in one in .410 is pretty low. I’d probably buy one in 12 gauge, though, just on principle.
January 19th, 2011 at 11:02 am
What? No picatinny rail, laser sights, flashlights, red dot sight, or bayonet? Major fail, I say!
Why do I get the impression this firearm was developed almost exclusively by a marketing department with wayyyy too much time available?
January 19th, 2011 at 1:14 pm
That carbine may (or may not) be practical, but it sure is fugly.
Almost like they could have put on a “Dragunov” stock and all those tacticool bells & whistles mikee mentioned and have it look better..
And I bet making it pump action would work better than a lever.
January 19th, 2011 at 1:27 pm
I don’t get the idea of a lever-action revolver, that combines two action-types into one inefficiency.
Isn’t there another problem with flame-cutting or cylinder blast coming from the forcing cone gap when you reach up there to grab ahold of something? Revolver meet hot-dog.
January 19th, 2011 at 6:18 pm
The one Circuit Judge I’ve seen had guards in place to deal with the cylinder gap blast.
January 19th, 2011 at 6:32 pm
Now here’s something that should have been built to take a .444 Marlin (or at least a P+ .45-70).
January 19th, 2011 at 6:38 pm
Otherwise, I’d rather get a Ishapore SMLE .410 conversion reamed out to take standard shells. At least that way I’d get a bayonet mount too.