Chicago Gun Case
Here’s NRA’s brief. Ilya Shapiro is less than impressed.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
February 10th, 2010 at 11:59 am
Not trying to be snarky here, but what would you expect Mr. Shaprio to say? He’s been opposed to the NRA getting involved from the beginning; I highly doubt he would publicly admit the NRA’s brief was just what Gura needed to win the case.
February 10th, 2010 at 8:31 pm
Oh, I am so surprised! Shocked, shocked I tell you.
February 10th, 2010 at 9:13 pm
Considering that the dumbos at the nra hired the guy who argued the case FOR the government the last time, what else could anyone expect?
February 10th, 2010 at 9:52 pm
It’s no different than Citizens United hiring Ted Olsen who previously argued for the government in 2003 defending McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform law.
It was NRA’s reply brief. Your not supposed to rehash arguments and recite cases from your opening brief. The reply brief properly focused on rebutting Chicago’s “arguments”.