Inaccuracies in the NFRTR
It’s a recurring theme here but Prince Law Offices says they found the smoking gun:
Of particular interest, on this one heavily redacted “Firearms Inspection Worknote”, at least two of the firearms were in the dealers inventory, but “not listed on the inventory list provided by the NFA branch.” In the second box, the agent apparently wrote in, “F4 [likely meaning Form 4] apvd [likely meaning approved] 8/7/01.” Thus, in all likelihood, the agent was presented with the approved Form 4 while doing the audit, even though the NFRTR either showed the suppressor as non-existent or registered to another person.
October 16th, 2009 at 3:03 pm
Would these be the same agents who prosecute licensees for using “y” instead of “yes”?