It all just unhappened
I saw this piece on how Fast and Furious didn’t really happen at Fortune. I immediately had a couple of thoughts:
Wow, what perfect timing! (and that, it seems, was a not unfounded)
Then, I wondered where Fortune got all the documents that the House can’t get their hands on to do a proper investigation.
Update: More here:
Given that it starts with this patent falsehood, you know you’re going to be in for a doozy.
June 27th, 2012 at 11:59 am
Investigation? More like the media equivalent of jamming fingers into ears and shouting La-La-La, I can’t hear you!
June 27th, 2012 at 12:14 pm
The artical is from Fortune. Not the same as Forbes.
June 27th, 2012 at 12:18 pm
d’oh. wires crossed.
June 27th, 2012 at 12:30 pm
Both links go to the same article.
June 27th, 2012 at 12:47 pm
Fixed. And I suck today.
June 27th, 2012 at 1:41 pm
What an amazing use of the Big Lie, it’s a whopper.
June 27th, 2012 at 2:13 pm
Anything titled “The truth about ___” is automatically highly suspect.
This rule seems to apply equally to news sites as well as blogs.
June 27th, 2012 at 2:55 pm
Yeah, I saw that POS piece of propaganda at Fortune – they’re daft.
However, AoSHQ has a link up today to this story, which will get your feet back under you:
http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2012/05/11/fast-and-furious-barack-obama%E2%80%99s-bloodiest-scandal-and-its-shameless-cover-up/
June 27th, 2012 at 5:51 pm
But if it didn’t happen then how was Fast and Furious Bush’s fault?
June 27th, 2012 at 11:26 pm
OK, Kasper, if you’re going to start using logic the Dems won’t let you play with them anymore.