Ammo For Sale

« « Criminals is smart | Home | Random Weekend Blogging » »

Right to bear arms

Extended to stun guns.

7 Responses to “Right to bear arms”

  1. Stan Says:

    Well slap my ass and call me Sally, we may end up being able to own stun guns in Michigan, or they’ll end up double plus illegal. Interesting either way.

  2. Bryan s. Says:

    Still with that whole regulation thing and completely ignoring the shall not be infringed part….. Can one regulate in the manner that the manner that the wod is used today, without infringing?

  3. Bubblehead Les Says:

    I just wish the Plaintiff did not have 2 Felony Convictions. I can see that the Appellate Courts would deny him the Right to Carry because of the Felonies, rather than Stun Guns being Arms themselves. Oh well, we’ll see how this plays out.

  4. Standard Mischief Says:

    No language about “muzzle-loading, period correct, pre-1899” stun guns?

    what wonderful news!

  5. blounttruth Says:

    Released yesterday:

    http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/7201-railroading-of-walter-reddy-patriots-legally-owned-guns-seized

  6. comatus Says:

    A period-correct stun gun would be a kite with a key, right? Those things are dangerous.

  7. Bryan S. Says:

    What about the sporting purpose of stun guns?

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local
Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges


bisonAd

Categories

Archives