What’s wrong with this picture?
Sent by Mark. I hope it’s a photoshop.
If you can’t tell, hit more for the answer (and don’t buy a gun until you’ve had a class or two).
The ammunition is in the magazine backward.
6 Responses to “What’s wrong with this picture?”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
February 20th, 2006 at 12:24 am
Thats an old picture, I saw it a couple of years ago on a gun board (Glock Talk???)
February 20th, 2006 at 2:47 am
Yes, it’s real, I brought that very catalog back from SHOT 2 years back. Amazing what happens when you don’t police your photographer, or the ad copy guy, or anyone in between, right up to the guy who approved the cover for printing…
February 20th, 2006 at 9:32 am
You would only need one round in that magazine…
Sort of a Kevorkian special.
😉
February 20th, 2006 at 4:08 pm
Jayzuz…you folks have good eyes. I couldn’t tell that was supposed to be a magazine. Something made me think of a tin-can opener in the shape of ammo.
Time to get the ole eyes checked.
February 20th, 2006 at 4:31 pm
Is it 45 long colt ammo being loaded into a mag to insert in a 9mm Baby Eagle?
I used to have one of those pistols several years ago, but I pretty much stuck with the “recommended” 9mm ammo.
Reminds me of the network footage (about a year or two ago) which erroneously implied that a semi-auto rifel was the same thing as a full auto because they look the same.
February 20th, 2006 at 4:35 pm
‘Is it 45 long colt ammo being loaded into a mag to insert in a 9mm Baby Eagle?’
No, it’s that the ammo is in the mag backwards.