Ammo For Sale

« « The Army’s new subgun | Home | I agree with this assessment » »

Bumpstock numbers

Taking the ATFs low estimate of 280,000 BSTDs sold, they have achieved a miraculous 0.30% compliance rate.

Posted in ATF on April 3rd, 2019 by SayUncle | RSS 2.0 |

8 Responses to “Bumpstock numbers”

  1. wizardpc Says:
    April 3rd, 2019 at 7:24 pm

    So why were these people not drilling the third hole before last week?

  2. Jerry Gibbs Says:
    April 3rd, 2019 at 9:00 pm

    I would say this, if I owned a bumpstock. you can have it.. And no, I wan’t no reason to waste ammo. I do not own one. I have belt loops on my pants. Bump stocks be damned. IT WAS JUST A GIMMICK. Let it fade. I like people, the nut job in Vegas, not so much. Think about that, Las Vegas, and there might be a nut job in the mix. Where will I vacation next?

  3. Carl "Bear" Bussjaeger Says:
    April 4th, 2019 at 7:21 am

    Bump stocks are a gimmick. The precedent of the rule is anything but.

    http://zelmanpartisans.com/?p=5929

    “Let it fade,” and you let all law fade, and we live by royal whim, imperial fiat. “Stroke of the pen” and all that entails.

  4. Ravenwood Says:
    April 4th, 2019 at 7:54 am

    I don’t own any either, but I support people’s right to own a hunk of plastic that makes bump firing easier.

    Personally, I’d rather just by a transferable machine gun, but then I don’t have any chilrens and plenty of disposable income to spend on adult toys.

  5. Ravenwood Says:
    April 4th, 2019 at 7:55 am

    buy.. not by.

  6. one-eyed Jack Says:
    April 4th, 2019 at 2:25 pm

    I don’t own one , but I know folks who do. They just shoot them for fun. What’s wrong with that? Jack.

  7. mikee Says:
    April 5th, 2019 at 1:25 pm

    The concept of collective punishment of an entire group, for illegal acts by individuals, is a violation of individual human rights under customary international humanitarian law, according to the Red Cross. Let’s try taking this issue to the UN!

    I kid! I kid! Somehow, I don’t think there will be anyone like Judge Benitez deciding such a case outside the US. And anyway, even Benitez just allowed the CA law prohibiting >10 round mags to stay in place during appeal of his own ruling against it.

    https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul_rule103

  8. Carl "Bear" Bussjaeger Says:
    April 5th, 2019 at 11:13 pm

    mikee, Benitez’ decision to — sort of — lift the injunction derailed an attempt to immediately escalate this to the 9th Circus. And his version seems to protect those who bought mags when his injunction was in effect. I suggest waiting to see how this plays out before condemning Benitez.