Baked the cake
The SCOTUS, in a ruling that doesn’t seem to resolve anything, ruled that a Colorado state panel violated the religious rights of a baker, who did not want to make a cake for a gay wedding.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
June 4th, 2018 at 5:40 pm
“You should be forced by law to serve those who specifically targeted you because they hate you and want you eliminated”, say the leftist agitators who think themselves enlightened.
Who knows that Jews, Catholics and Muslims came out officially in support of the baker? Not widely reported, was it? Try forcing Muslims to cater to Jewish events and see how much love and support you get from the lamestream media, you sick, xenophobic bigot.
June 4th, 2018 at 9:26 pm
From what I hear, SCOTUS didn’t rule that the commission was unconstitutional, but that the overtly anti-religious leftists on the commission were biased and therefore there was an equal protection violation.
If they replace the commissioners with anti-religious leftists who have never expressed their bigotry in a recorded medium, they might get away with it.
June 5th, 2018 at 11:25 am
It was a weird read for me. The justices obviously felt like there should have been better consideration for the religious rights… yet I don’t think that the Colorado statute had that requirement. So which is it, Supreme Court? Can a sincerely (emphasis on “sincerely”) held religious belief be the basis for not providing a particular service OR do businesses have the obligation to provided all services to all people in protected classes?? Nevermind that (I think) private businesses can still refuse to provide service to anyone based on no reason at all so long as it is not based on their belonging to a protected class.