Ammo For Sale

« « Gun Porn | Home | Taxing a right » »

Court holds that stun guns are “dangerous and unusual”

Are stun guns protected by the Second Amendment?

4 Responses to “Court holds that stun guns are “dangerous and unusual””

  1. Matthew Carberry Says:

    Of course they aren’t protected. Why Ol’ Ben Franklin had barely invented electricity by that point, there’s no way the Founders could have foreseen lightning guns.

  2. mikee Says:

    The idea that the only constitutionally protected civilian weapons commonly in use at the time of Heller dicta is pernicious. I, for one, want my phased plasma rifle, whenever it gets invented.

  3. Lyle Says:

    Anything which can be used as a weapon is protected, but that’s not the point. The question is not whether a right to possess any particular object or substance is specifically protected. The question is whether any of this is any of government’s proper business. It isn’t.

  4. Mr. Chubbins Says:

    So, the police are guilty of torture or something?

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local
Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges


bisonAd

Categories

Archives