Nanny state and litigation seem to correlate
2 Responses to “Nanny state and litigation seem to correlate”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
January 6th, 2015 at 7:28 pm
City should ban it and do nothing to enforce the ban. When somebody sues for getting hurt sledding, throw them in jail for illegal sledding, and get the case thrown out.
Not an ideal solution, but that’s the way to make the best of it.
January 7th, 2015 at 11:16 am
Alternately, and more likely, the police will issue citations to several hundred sledders per snowstorm, with an associated fine of several hundred dollars per citation, plus of course court costs.
Revenue enhancement – if something is not allowed (and permitted, with a stiff fee to participate) it is of course forbidden (and illegal, with a stiff fee to participate).
Which is more likely a situation in a few years, that of dustydog or mine?