Meh
Democrats are trying to confirm an anti-gunner as chief nanny before the sessions ends. Does the surgeon general actually do anything?
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
December 10th, 2014 at 2:38 pm
He would be the guy under whose signature guns would be declared a public health risk. Like polio, tobacco, and fat lesbians. (I’m not making up the fat lesbians thing.)
December 10th, 2014 at 5:22 pm
Would that mean an executive order disarming all Federal employees?
December 10th, 2014 at 6:47 pm
No, employment by the Reich, I mean, the Federal Government provides herd immunity from public health issues such as laws banning firearms.
December 11th, 2014 at 9:30 am
But wait! The President just said the other day that “we all need to feel that we are equal under the law.” Oh, but wait, he said FEEL, not actually BE equal.
December 11th, 2014 at 11:43 am
We don’t need a Surgeon General.
We need an Attorney General.
December 12th, 2014 at 7:21 am
By the look of the last Surgeon General, it would seem that the dot gov mixed up the missions. That Good Doctor looked more appropriate to Saving The Whales….