Ammo For Sale

« « We’re winning | Home | Unpossible » »

But that’s against the law!

Coloradans circumvent ban on standard capacity magazines

8 Responses to “But that’s against the law!”

  1. Rich Says:

    Yes we do. If not for this law I would probably have about 15, 30 rd ar mags. But, instead, I have 1 even shit load. In addition, every time I leave the state I come back with many. Great CO XMAS stocking stuffers.

    Hopefully McLachlan, Udall and Hickenlooper will be history in 72 hours. I think they are all close races.

    Cheers from four corners CO.

  2. Antagon Says:

    I read your headline as “that’s against the lawl”. I like it better my way.

  3. wizardpc Says:

    Rep. Rhonda Fields, who sponsored Colorado’s high capacity magazine ban, declined to be interviewed about what CBS4 had found, saying she was concerned it might impact the November 4 elections.

    She’d hate to remind people this was all her doing….

  4. Matt Says:

    We used to do the same thing in CA, until some “lawmaker” caught wind of it and they banned “rebuild kits” too.

  5. Jim Scrummy Says:

    Good.

  6. Kristophr Says:

    Looks like my old boss, Randy Moss, made the last bit of that film.

    I’ll bet the newsies chopped the hell out of the interview with him.

  7. Sigivald Says:

    “We have to do something to not make it easy to have people mowed down by crazed shooters. I thought it would be an effective law,” said Mauser.

    While I understand that Mr. Mauser (oh, irony) was obviously grieving and wanted To Do Something, it baffles me that anyone could have honestly thought that law would be “effective”.

  8. precision270 Says:

    because laws against human nature always work. NOT

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local
Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges


bisonAd

Categories

Archives