In dancing in blood news
Harry Reid says no to gun control bills. But I read on the internet that the NRA sucks for endorsing that guy.
Obama camp walks back gun ban news. It’s an election year.
7 Responses to “In dancing in blood news”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
July 27th, 2012 at 8:54 am
Tell me how Prince Harry voted on Sotomayor and Kagan? That’s why he lost his endorsement. He had been a friend of gun owners. Now that Chuck U has attached a mag ban to a cyber security bill, we’ll see what happens.
July 27th, 2012 at 12:10 pm
RE 50 Senators: Nice, but when you have an Admin that thumbs it nose at Congress and SCOTUS, does it matter?
July 27th, 2012 at 1:10 pm
That the NRA keeps supporting this guy *does* suck. There, you read it on the internet again.
If anyone believes Dingy Harry is pro-gun on principle and an asset to have in the Senate on those grounds, especially as majority leader, then I have a bridge to sell you. Yeah, I know, Schumer or Durbin would be worse, and he lost his NRA endorsement, but they still give him an undeserved “B”.
He’s protecting his partisans. Don’t want to put them in the difficult position to actually *vote* on a gun bill (pro or anti) right before election.
July 27th, 2012 at 2:28 pm
Thanks for the link.
It must suck to have to “walk back” that idiot’s statements. You’d think that the guy who’d have to walk it back would have a chat with the idiot programming the teleprompter. If they could keep him from saying it, they’d have less to walk back.
July 27th, 2012 at 2:49 pm
We should be ashamed for keeping the U.N. to ourselves for all these years. The hookers and drug dealers of other countries should have the benefit of their wisdom, grace, knowledge and culture. I’d love to see how many ambassadors would be “unable to attend” if the HQ was in Mumbai, or Moscow.
July 27th, 2012 at 6:11 pm
I seriously doubt Sharron Angle was an anti. Knee-jerk conservative, yes (a key reason why she lost the thin margin of victory down the stretch), but not an anti.
Taking out Reid arguably wouldn’t have made any difference to gun rights, but it could have knocked down Obamacare. I’m not sold on that trade, sorry.
July 27th, 2012 at 6:23 pm
As far as the senators are concerned, there are a lot of them that would disarm us in a heartbeat if they could. I guess if it’s unanimous against the ATT, then it’s because they don’t want the UN messing in their political domains, not because they’re suddenly pro-gun.