Ammo For Sale

« « Obviously, compensating for the size of his penis | Home | Top smartphone maker: Samsung » »

Those limited government Republicans

Having solved other problems the state of Tennessee is facing, our governor has signed a law ridding us of the scourge of saggy pants in school.

8 Responses to “Those limited government Republicans”

  1. el bombardero Says:

    Reagan strikes again. Christian God bless America

  2. nk Says:

    1971, Lane Tech, Chicago. No blue jeans, corduroys ok. Belt required, if not, the vice principal would give you a piece of rope.

    My first wife thinks that it’s all my fault that we get complaints from my ten year old daughter’s school because she dresses goth punk. F*** them.

  3. mikee Says:

    The problem with the aphorism about “power corrupts” is that the corruption shows up in darn odd ways sometimes.

    How does one slap down such stupidity in a way that edumacates the stupid, but now-powerful, legislators who have been corrupted by their power?

    I wish we could get a law passed requiring shock collars, as used by dog trainers, to be put on all legislators. With the remote controls held by partisans of both major parties, misbehavior might be rapidly punished while extreme legislation would require legislators to endure real pain during its passage.

    I don’t think anything less would work with the “baggy pants” type of legislators.

  4. SGB Says:

    Single party nation = ridiculous laws.

  5. Ellen Says:

    It may be prejudice, but I don’t trust people in saggy pants. Occasional adult plumbers excepted. It’s their right to wear them; it’s my right to avoid them. Your mileage may vary.

  6. Kristopher Says:

    You don’t need a law to get rid of them. Just tell the kids where the practice started:

    California prison bitches advertizing for new customers.

  7. Ron W Says:

    I wish conservative legislators would CONSERVE their U.S. and State Constitutions which would result in the most liberty. And I wish liberals were for ALL the liberties enumerated in our U.S. and State Constitutions. Such is not the “bipartisan” case.

  8. NUGUN Says:

    I am almost torn. As I consider having your pants hanging down and your underwear showing to be indecent exposure.

    Seriously. Want to show your underwear, do it in privacy. Not in public. If I were to walk around with my pants down and just my underwear showing I’d be arrested. So why not a gang banger teenager.

    That said, I don’t think we need a new law. I think this fell under the old laws.

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local
Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges