Not that I ever wondered but . . .
I Shall Explain Paul Krugman. I could have done it in fewer words: hack.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
November 23rd, 2011 at 11:54 am
Unc, let me try. Paul Krugman deserved his Nobel as much as BHO deserved his!
November 23rd, 2011 at 12:57 pm
Might actually be compelling if he pointed out something Paulie got wrong.
PK actually went back and did admit he was wrong about oil speculation. I wonder if that blogger has ever done as much.
November 23rd, 2011 at 4:46 pm
STB, rhetorical question: can anyone who parrots the liberal line as closely as Krugman does, ever be correct? Use logic to answer, please.
November 23rd, 2011 at 11:53 pm
Krugman passed hack and went straight to brazen liar years ago.
November 24th, 2011 at 12:02 am
And for Sebastien, I would point out that Krugman has been caught calling “bizarre” concepts found in his own textbook. His attempt at a defense was complete sophistry.
Add in the columns where he just writes a whole column making the “broken window fallacy” and “Hack” remains a compliment to Krugman.
November 29th, 2011 at 8:39 pm
Rivrdog: Krugman has been about 75% accurate in his predictions over time according to the Financial Times. The only economist better is Nouriel Roubini. You can google him. If you want to see folks who are never right on anything just read Allan Meltzer or Larry Lindsey. It’s a rule of thumb in the economics world: What ever those two say, bet the other way.