An odd tale
Jury find doctor not guilty for cutting off man’s penis without permission. That’s probably about the only way I’d have cancer removed. I doubt I could give permission to do that. I’m rather fond of it.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
August 26th, 2011 at 9:48 am
it’s amazing to me how many of my fellow males are reactionary enough to choose death over dick damage.
August 26th, 2011 at 9:59 am
Well at least he is not hugging a tree, I think he looks good, this will make Putin jealous, he will have to bend some more frying pans.
August 26th, 2011 at 10:26 am
Sorry above post was not for this subject
August 26th, 2011 at 11:48 am
If they’re gonna go that far, might as well go all the way and switch teams (if you know what I mean).
The future ain’t what it used to be: living life as a ragin’ lesbian, who was really born a man.
August 26th, 2011 at 1:22 pm
This was the leading story here in Louisville for three nights. The testimony from his wife (He’s not my husband anymore. He’s changed so much.) was ludicrous. Guy’s lucky to be alive, he should thank the doctor for doing it.
August 26th, 2011 at 6:50 pm
I still think it was an ethics violation.
He was not going to die withing the next few days. They should have simply stopped, closed the wound, and gotten his permission the next day.
Language in releases about emergency circumstances are supposed to be about just that … preventing the patient from dying on the table.
Not making a judgement call for the patient.
As for the jury verdict … they were determining cost and value of a man’s life, not moral issues.
The doctor may not owe the man a settlement … but that doctor has a severe ethics problem, and should not practice.