Chicago will be begging me to move before I am done with them.
My victory is minor, but it does stop the City from a gross interpretation of their definition of ‘assault rifle’ in which they were denying rifles because they could be modified into ‘assault rifles’.
Yes, definitely a victory, congratulations, Kevin, and thank you. You might have to ask for permission, but the master has been kicked in the shins. Interesting to see the SKS at issue; I had not thought of the SKS as of any particular “antique” interest, but yes, I can see that. Just got back from Chicago, and it is a town worth taking back. You just took back a piece of it.
“‘We don’t have problems with legal guns owned by responsible, trained people. We have a problem with irresponsible and criminal people who have guns,’ Montalbano said.”
August 8th, 2011 at 9:52 am
Victory? I guess.
But he is now allowed to beg at the hands of his master. Just before, there could be no begging.
August 8th, 2011 at 10:23 am
Chicago will be begging me to move before I am done with them.
My victory is minor, but it does stop the City from a gross interpretation of their definition of ‘assault rifle’ in which they were denying rifles because they could be modified into ‘assault rifles’.
August 8th, 2011 at 10:32 am
I hope you succeed. I personally wouldn’t have lasted as long, and would have moved.
Bravo sir on sticking to it.
August 8th, 2011 at 3:48 pm
Yes, definitely a victory, congratulations, Kevin, and thank you. You might have to ask for permission, but the master has been kicked in the shins. Interesting to see the SKS at issue; I had not thought of the SKS as of any particular “antique” interest, but yes, I can see that. Just got back from Chicago, and it is a town worth taking back. You just took back a piece of it.
August 8th, 2011 at 9:07 pm
“‘We don’t have problems with legal guns owned by responsible, trained people. We have a problem with irresponsible and criminal people who have guns,’ Montalbano said.”
I’d like to buy that man lunch.