Why not?
Robb on these new rounds designed for suppression:
I don’t understand the desire to create a subsonic rifle round specifically so it can be suppressed.
Because you can. And to dispatch varmints without annoying your neighbors.
4 Responses to “Why not?”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
March 11th, 2011 at 10:26 am
Because you can always works for me 😉
I see there’s a legitimate accuracy boost for certain rounds being below the sound barrier.
I love learning about things!
March 11th, 2011 at 11:40 am
“I don’t understand the desire to create a subsonic rifle round specifically so it can be suppressed.”
Improved range and accuracy with heavy bullets due to a better ballistic coefficient…
March 11th, 2011 at 2:07 pm
f=ma
if you increase the mass and decrease the acceleration, you can get the same force. (Acceleration here would be the deceleration the bullet experiences when it hits its target.)
March 11th, 2011 at 2:39 pm
I shoot Remington Match subsonics because they are the most accurate.
It’s actually been studied. A bullet is most accurate at about 870 fps.
Your mileage may vary.