Awesome
James Austin wins IPSC match with iron sighted revolver, up against a field open and limited semi-autos.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
January 20th, 2011 at 5:38 pm
What was the point of the magazine ban again?
January 20th, 2011 at 5:55 pm
As a “B” class Revolver shooter (compared to “C” Single Stack), I have to add two things:
Hooray!
And
It wasn’t an IPSC match. It was a USPSA match. There are almost no IPSC matches in the US.
Speaking as a club’s USPSA program director and certified RO, there is a difference.
IPSC’s a different game for places with lousy gun laws.
My apologies for the pedantry.
January 20th, 2011 at 9:49 pm
Yes, WPZ is technically correct. USPSA is the US representative for IPSC, and USPSA uses a different set of rules from the IPSC rules. However, USPSA also owns Steel Challenge (SCSA), so to call a match a USPSA match could also be confusing to a reader, as then it could have also been a Steel Challenge match. I suppose you could call it a USPSA/IPSC match, but if you call it an IPSC match and it’s in the USA, most everyone knows what you are talking about.
Mr. C.