Ammo For Sale

« « Cinco de Quatro | Home | College students and guns » »

Quote of the day

Pure brilliance:

Gun nuts love to say that if guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns. I actually don’t see why that’s a problem. It would certainly make it a lot easier to determine who the criminals are. If someone is walking around with a gun, and they aren’t a policeman, then they’re a criminal. Lock ‘em up.

Next, people with dangerous ideas will be banned. Like in England.

Clenched fist salute to ACK.

21 Responses to “Quote of the day”

  1. Robb Allen Says:

    “Lock ‘em up”

    If the police and justice systems did this to begin with, we’d not have the problem in the first place. Unfortunately, real criminals, those with ill intent, are still on the street even with rap sheets bound into volumes for easy reference.

    This… “irony free since 2003” person doesn’t seem to comprehend the sheer magnitude of defensive gun uses that they’re willing to forgo for the illusion of ‘doing something’.

    And they call us ‘asshats’?

  2. tam Says:

    Yeah, up here in IN, where a permit costs $25, has no training requirement, and lets you carry in bars while drinking, we shoot each other up in bars all the time. I’m always having to duck and cover at the Broad Ripple Brew Pub…

    What planet are these cretins from? They keep yelping “Blood in the streets! Shootouts over parking spaces!” and it keeps not happening, yet it doesn’t shut them up.

    Blood in the streets! Shootouts over parking spaces!Blood in the streets! Shootouts over parking spaces!Blood in the streets! Shootouts over parking spaces!Blood in the streets! Shootouts over parking spaces!” Christ, they’re like demented parrots. Hit the bird, Ruth; it’s stuck.

  3. Robb Allen Says:

    (nice FS ref there, Tam).

    Same here in the Gunshine state. I can go armed to a restaurant that serves booze. I am allowed to drink booze even while carrying (not a good idea, but it’s not against the law). The shootouts simply do not happen.

    I argue the same thing when they talk about certain areas should be off limits. We Floridians can carry to church, to parks, to little league games, to the zoo, on public transportation (I think), into clothing stores, homeless shelters, parades, and the art museum.

    And still, the shootouts simply do not happen.

  4. RC Says:

    Funny how these cretins never quite notice how badly they are slandering the people from wherever they are from. The overwheming majority of people in the country are somehow more rational and stable than their fellows wherever they are. Almost everywhere there are no bloodbaths, killings over parking spaces etc and the gun laws are less restrictive but their peers will shoot at a drop of a hint.

  5. Ron W Says:

    Often these anti-gunners are so-called “liberals”, but not when it comes to the most basic human right and liberty to carry the means to protect your own body. They usually SAY they are for diversity and tolerance, yet they react toward those who exercise armed self defense with bigotry and prejudice–presuming that we are dangerous idiots are criminals.

  6. Yu-Ain Gonnano Says:

    “It wasn’t that the city was lawless. It had plenty of laws. It just didn’t offer many opportunities not to break them. Swing didn’t seem to have grasped the idea that the system was supposed to take criminals and, in some rough-and-ready fashion, force them into becoming honest men. Instead, he’d taken honest men and turned them into criminals.

    -Terry Pratchett: ‘Night Watch’

  7. Matt Groom Says:

    I’m pretty sure that if they tried to arrest me for merely POSSESSING a gun, there really would be Blood in the streets and shootouts in parking lots, or where ever I was when they came for me. Sort of a self fulfilling prophecy, no?

    I’m not gonna poo-poo the Brits for not allowing Micheal Savage into their commune. I wouldn’t want him in my house either. In fact, we should imitate the Brits, nay, do them one better. We should kick all of the people out of the country who do not support private property, freedom of religion, the Constitution, and all of the other values that Americans believe in and those that our nation were founded upon. We could send them all to Formerly Great Britain, and they could be with their own.

  8. Weer'd Beard Says:

    Too bad Bush isn’t President anymore. He was a great tool for the “Give all the muscle to the state” klowns.

    Not that anything has changed in the latest switch of head-of-state. Of course the attitudes of the blind have changed a good deal.

  9. Robb Allen Says:

    I started typing up a long response full of facts and whatnot, then closed the browser.

    The effort is better spent on teaching a brick to roll over (although the results are the same).

  10. SayUncle Says:

    i used to try. now, i point and laugh.

  11. Mikee Says:

    I like reading the comments sections of rants like the one linked. Within very few commenters, every single discredited lie of the anti-gun community has been presented, and then discredited by the pro-gun (and vastly better informed) commenters.

    What gets sad is that there has not been a new argument, or logical (let alone fact-based) support for the anti-gun position in any such thread I have read since before Heller came out.

    This leads me to believe that the half dozen regular arguments of anti-gunners have met a brick wall, in that the call of pro-gunners, self defense is a human right, is starting to resonate in this country more and more. Good.

  12. Tam Says:

    You mean Reasoned Discourse hasn’t broken out yet?

  13. Rustmeister Says:

    No, comments are still open. =)

  14. Regolith Says:

    There’s a first…as stupid as his statements are, he at least hasn’t taken his ball and gone home yet.

    Keyword being “yet.”

  15. Guav Says:

    I find that Reasoned Discourse™ generally only breaks out when the poster is outnumbered and is ill-equipped to defend their original post. On blogs where there are many like-minded resident commenters to help shoulder the load and help fight us knuckle-dragging murders, the poster usually lets comments stay.

    On the other hand, I could be completely wrong. But I’m having fun over there while I can.

  16. Lyle Says:

    A pretty good way to identify a criminal is; he’s the one who’s committing the crimes. If all we have to go by is the gun he’s carrying, maybe he’d just hide the gun. Ya think?

  17. SayUncle Says:

    Guav still has faith in the TN progressives. That’s so cute.

  18. ATL Says:

    Two Words: Bring it!

    I remember this gem from Tam’s site a while back concerning Lib’s and their attempts to try and disarm us:

    “Face it “progressives”, we control the purse and we have people who can pay their own medical bills, pay for their own homes, and manufacture their own ammunition. You have people who call 911 because McDonalds is out of Chicken McNuggets. You’re fucked.”

  19. Linoge Says:

    Wow… what a steaming cesspool of ignorance, stupidity, and outright bigotry.

    I wonder if they would realize the bias and discrimination of their words if you replaced every instance of “handgun” with “black person”.

    Cancel that… I already know the answer.

  20. dustydog Says:

    That’s smart thinking. But it’ll work better in reverse. If somebody is walking around and not open carrying a gun, then they’re a criminal. Lock ‘em up. Actually, do whatever you want to them – lock them up, rob them, leave them alone.

  21. JKB Says:

    Hey didn’t they use this logic for the DC gun laws? Something like if people are allowed to own guns we won’t be able to identify the criminals. Oh and the gun ban made it a lot simpler to put people in jail rather than bother with all that prosecution for actual crimes committed.

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local
Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges


bisonAd

Categories

Archives