National Review Online
Shills for Romney. Sorry, but NRO just lost any conservative street cred they had. And this:
Fred Thompson is as conservative as Romney
Err, no. Hillary Clinton is as conservative as Romney. Kucinich is slightly less conservative than Romney. As far as I’m concerned, if the nom is Romney or Giuliani, then the Republicans may as well run Hillary Clinton.
December 12th, 2007 at 10:25 am
Bought. And. Paid. For.
There’s a reason I haven’t read that magazine in years.
December 12th, 2007 at 11:49 am
Good catch Uncle! So all we have left is ‘the unmentionable one’ and the huckster? Or is it Hucka-flop?
December 12th, 2007 at 12:32 pm
One thing that Buckley, Jonah Goldberg and the rest of the NRO staff have NEVER grasped in the slightest…..is the Second Amendment. They just don’t get it.
December 12th, 2007 at 2:25 pm
Ditto.
December 12th, 2007 at 2:26 pm
Amen.
December 12th, 2007 at 2:48 pm
Well, Giuliani might wear the same dress as Hilary.
December 12th, 2007 at 3:24 pm
Giuliani has better legs than Hillary… But Romny is a gun-grabber and Fred’s a lot more conservative than Mitt.
December 12th, 2007 at 5:24 pm
Guiliani would be a more effective gun-grabber than Hillary because, like with GWB, some Republicans would capitulate if he was doin’ it, but offer resistance against Hillary.
I will NOT “waste my vote” on any gun-grabber!!! It’s evil to vote for either of “the lesser of two evils”!!
December 12th, 2007 at 6:52 pm
So, Uncle, who are you for, then?
December 12th, 2007 at 7:52 pm
Tough question. Undecided.
December 12th, 2007 at 9:39 pm
Technical foul. Thompson is a lot more conservative than Romney, but fixing that minor error would have scarcely affected their point. Make a few minor fixes, and their greater point stands:
December 12th, 2007 at 9:40 pm
Err, the “and” following the bolded insert should have been strikeout/deleted text.
December 13th, 2007 at 12:09 am
OMG google hukabee – I can’t believe what a shitty record he has in arkansas. more pardons than bill clinton? amazing!