Heller in the NYT

Posted in uncategorized on November 21st, 2007 by SayUncle | RSS 2.0 |

Cactus Jack Says:
November 21st, 2007 at 3:16 pm
“The hope, which we share, is that the court will rise above the hard-right ideology of some justices to render a decision respectful of the Constitution’s text and the violent consequences of denying government broad room to regulate guns. The fear is that it will not.”

Honoring ” the right of the people to keep and bear arms” would be a decision respectful of the Constitution’s text.

“Beyond grappling with fairly esoteric arguments about the Second Amendment, the justices need to responsibly confront modern-day reality”

I hope they do too because modern day reality, something that libs are clueless about, shows that restrictions on firearms do NOTHING to curb crime.

” A decision that upends needed gun controls currently in place around the country would imperil the lives of Americans”

That might be true if all Americans who practice their second ammendment rights were psycos, like Jayne Lynn Stahl would have the country believe, but we’re not. The only lives that would be “imperiled” would be that of criminals.
CTD Says:
November 21st, 2007 at 5:49 pm
like the trigger gaurds

I do not think that word means what they think it means. ðŸ™‚
Xrlq Says:
November 26th, 2007 at 9:34 pm
Appellate courts followed that interpretation, until last spring’s departure.

Translation: who/what the hell is Emerson?

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local
Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges

Categories