Firearms litmus test for politicos
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
September 25th, 2007 at 4:18 pm
The Firearms Litmus Test
All questions are to be answered “yes” or “no.”
1) If you are elected President, do you agree to unconditionally oppose up to and including a Presidential veto any and all legislation promulgating lawsuits aimed at bankrupting or placing unwarranted restrictions on the firearms industry?
2) If you are elected President. do you agree to unconditionally oppose up to and including a Presidential veto any legislation aimed at banning or limiting citizens’ access to specific weapons, including so-called “assault” weapons?
3) If you are elected President, do you agree to unconditionally support, including signing into law if it is passed by Congress, legislation providing that every person in America who is not prohibited from owning a firearm has a right to carry a firearm regardless of state or local prohibitions?
There! That wasn’t so hard, was it? Remember, “let me explain” is not an acceptable answer; “let me explain” is poltician-speak for “no.”
I’d love to ask all of the Presidential hopefuls those questions though I’m sure that the only one who would’nt say “let me explain” would be Fred Thompson.