Limits
In PA, the one gun a month law misfires:
They’re at it again. Gun-control advocates and their friends in state government are once again trying to nibble away at your right to own firearms. But you’ve got to hand it to them, as they’re quite crafty.
This latest proposal, which is merely a retread of Gov. Ed Rendell’s 2002 campaign proposal to restrict firearm ownership, would limit handgun purchases to one per month.
It all sounds relatively mild. After all, who would want to purchase more than one handgun per month?
Certainly, the anti-gun crowd would lead us to believe, only criminals would.
Well, if they can limit purchases to one a month, why not one a year or once in a lifetime?
August 21st, 2006 at 11:01 am
This is a rhetorical question.
Who wouldn’t want to purchase more than one handgun per month?
Just let the General Assembly try this nonsense in Tn.
August 21st, 2006 at 2:20 pm
What if they said you could only purchase one beer a month so’s folks wouldn’t get drunk and kill the children? You now it’s always about “for the children”.
Why is it that “liberals” are really never liberal re: the most basic human right and having the choice to acquire, keep and carry the means thereof??