Thought for a Monday
You know how some anti-gun types seem to think guns are sentient beings, capable of actions all on their own?
Maybe we should think that way too, that way guns would be considered innocent until proven guilty.
Wonder what a jury of its peers would look like?
August 13th, 2007 at 12:05 pm
There’s likely to be an old musket in the jury box: “Why back in my day we didn’t have this auto-loading nonsense. Had to reload by y’self and you loved it!”
August 13th, 2007 at 12:50 pm
Ace, that’s classic.
August 13th, 2007 at 1:31 pm
“You know how some anti-gun types seem to think guns are sentient beings, capable of actions all on their own?”
Sometimes I wonder if the anti-gun types are sentient, and whether they are capable of actions all on their own…
August 13th, 2007 at 2:00 pm
Of course, if you go down that alley far enough, you run into the slavery problem, and how sentient beings cannot be bought and sold to other sentient beings, so we still get screwed.
Me, I think PSH liberals need to have their internet home pages set up to be http://www.assaultweaponwatch.com/ .
August 13th, 2007 at 3:05 pm
LOL @ BobG. You got that right.
Linoge, I see it’s grown a bayonet since I last saw it. It’s up to something, I tell ya….
August 13th, 2007 at 4:23 pm
Well, I wouldn’t mind being judged by 12 of my own…but I don’t like the look of those MAC-10’s across the street.
August 13th, 2007 at 5:07 pm
“Tarnation! Them damn dirty Glocks just moved in down the street. There goes the neighborhood…”
August 13th, 2007 at 8:56 pm
I caught a snapshot of the jury pool…
August 13th, 2007 at 9:48 pm
Jay G Says:
August 13th, 2007 at 8:56 pm
I caught a snapshot of the jury pool…
————————————————————————————–
That jury pool might be biased! Long guns aint represented!
August 14th, 2007 at 10:35 am
Would a Glock get a fair shake from a buncha nickel-plated, pearl-handled revolvers?