At least the ninth circuit is consistent

Not only does the second amendment not mean what it says, neither does the first.

Posted in uncategorized on March 6th, 2007 by SayUncle | RSS 2.0 |

Random Nuclear Strikes » Step Quick Says:
March 6th, 2007 at 10:50 am
[…] Eugene Volokh (via Uncle)comes word that the 9th Circuit Federal Court has ruled that wearing a shirt with a printed message […]
Nomen Nescio Says:
March 6th, 2007 at 10:57 am
seems perfectly consistent with established precedents — minors have effectively no rights, particularly not when at school.

no, i don’t like it either, but it does jive well with stare decisis and with previous case law. none of the three would be the case were i dictator, but i’m not.
straightarrow Says:
March 8th, 2007 at 12:00 am
Nescio, if that be so, then the other side of this issue has no right to express their views, either. That obvioulsy is not the case. The court has done again what it has no right or legitimate power to do. It has advocated for a party before it, rather than render impartially an opinion based on law.
2nd Amendment Blogburst at Traction Control Says:
March 14th, 2007 at 9:46 pm
[…] At least the ninth circuit is consistent […]

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local
Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges

Categories