But 90% support expanded background checks
6 Responses to “But 90% support expanded background checks”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
November 6th, 2014 at 7:39 pm
Washington, since 1975, has been inundated by lefty progs from California, particularly the Puget Sound region and now Spokane.
Anywhere the Democrat paradise is trying to be established, you get a Washington state.
Note that wherever Microsoft doesn’t reach, folks are pretty much the same as when I left there in 1970; the leave me the Eff alone types.
November 7th, 2014 at 12:16 pm
Glad I moved out of there and into fly-over country. Washington is becoming Kalifornia North, which was one of the main reasons I left.
November 7th, 2014 at 12:19 pm
That map shows Whitman County as voting “yes” but as of today the ballots haven’t been counted. Just sayin’
November 7th, 2014 at 1:49 pm
Background checks on my RIGHTS? I don’t THINK so!
gfa
November 7th, 2014 at 4:25 pm
Background checks on private sales of guns would violate the 4th and 5th Amendments. I thought liberals always supported those rights. But If not, “what goes around, comes around.”
November 8th, 2014 at 2:57 pm
When most people hear expanded background checks, they assume we are talking about:
checking the backgrounds of US military officers, police forces, other emergency responders, power plant workers, people who work in secure areas of airports
checking the backgrounds of teacher, teacher aides, doctors, nurses, and other health care professionals that work around children
checking the background of bureaucrats, including the IRS, VA, CDC, judges, and candidates for elected office.