Oppressive Regimes
In NJ, Man hears a ruckus. Gets shotgun to check it out. It’s the police at a neighboring property. The police tried to put him away for 10 years. Fortunately, a jury acquitted him.
6 Responses to “Oppressive Regimes”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
April 9th, 2014 at 4:59 am
What do you want to bet he was arrested because the officers present shit themselves when they heard him pump the shotgun???
April 9th, 2014 at 9:45 am
Lucky him, in Albuquerque he’d lain dead on his doorstep as a “clear threat” to officer safety.
April 9th, 2014 at 11:35 am
“Albuquerque.”
In Detroit, they’d have shot him on Beaubien, and dragged the stiff over to John R because it’s easier to spell on the report.
April 9th, 2014 at 7:05 pm
Yea in Texas they would have shot him (as has been done in the last year here.)
If I hear a ruckus I take my Glock, hidden in it’s holster, and I don’t wave it around unless I see a real threat.
See, I don’t wanna be shot, or arrested.
April 9th, 2014 at 7:44 pm
It’s obvious that he should have fired two warning shots over the suspicious persons’ heads. Biden was right, it’s not enough to just point the shotgun, you have to fire it. Twice.
Thank God for sensible juries.
April 11th, 2014 at 6:30 pm
I own both a Glock and a shotgun. Now I’m conflicted about “better defensive weapon” vs “less likely to be shot by officers.”
Perhaps I need to switch to an AR, and avoid such issues?