Ammo For Sale

« « At least they admit it | Home | In Zimmerman news » »

No second amendment right to a “billy”

No right to bear a baseball bat with bolt through it.

5 Responses to “No second amendment right to a “billy””

  1. Samuel Suggs Says:

    Anyone else think this represents a deeper test of public response than it would at first glance appear

  2. rickn8or Says:

    Instead, it appears to us to be a weapon which, by its very nature, increases the risk of violence in any given situation, is a classic instrument of violence, and has a home-made criminal and improper purpose.

    How does a weapon, “by it’s very nature” increase the risk of violence?

    I guess we’re limited (or at least people in the 9th Circus) to weapons which won’t hurt anyone.

  3. mikee Says:

    I know an older gentleman who carries in his car a 2 foot length of 3/4″ i.d. iron gas line pipe, commonly used to help him with levering the lug nut wrench should he have a flat tire.

    He also has used it to inform unruly people accosting him in public that he was about to change a tire, and that they should vacate his immediate vicinity lest it hit their heads.

    Is that a cowardly weapon, likely to incite violence, or a tool?

  4. comatus Says:

    I’ve almost forgotten what the old name for a “police tactical baton” was. Anyone remember? Yeah, that’s it.

    I’ve been told that was primarily a signalling device.

  5. phenicks Says:

    Isn’t a wooden pole-arm w/ metal and/or spikes at the head a mace? A billy is a short club ~10″ to tee-ball length.

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local
Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges


bisonAd

Categories

Archives