In Court News
NJ Court says the right to bear arms ends at your front door. SAF is appealing.
Brady Campaign was four minutes late filing, and loses nuisance lawsuit. More from John.
NSSF loses challenge to illegal multiple long gun reporting case. This requirement is quite clearly not the intention of congress and, by most accounts, illegal. But the court said it was OK. I’ll never understand the courts.
January 16th, 2012 at 10:57 am
Denny Henny is slowing down in his old age. 🙂
January 16th, 2012 at 11:02 am
Jerks in Jersey? Who would have guessed!
January 16th, 2012 at 12:56 pm
Hey, imagine that – infringing on things that shall not be infringed!
January 16th, 2012 at 3:25 pm
Uh, so I guess New Jersey Federal Judges can ignore Rulings by their Bosses in SCOTUS, such as Heller and McDonald, huh? Must be nice.
January 16th, 2012 at 4:24 pm
The wheel grinds slow, Les, but it grinds exceedingly fine. I’m every bit as much an impatient [Ohio] prick as you are, but I gay-ron-tee that sucker will come round. This is what we get for the privilege of living in mankind’s Great Experiment.
January 16th, 2012 at 10:41 pm
That’s actually an improvement. It would mean that New Jersey actually admit that the ‘right to bear arms’ means that the people have the right to bear arms.
I’m pretty sure DC, Maryland and New York still think it is a privilege to be granted by the state.
I’m going to have to try to wrap my head around this judge’s twisted logic on this one.
January 17th, 2012 at 11:22 am
Keep in mind that the courts live by the adage that “it’s better to be consistent than to be right,” ignoring (or accepting) the fact that such a philosophy means that once you’re wrong on a subject, you will always be wrong on that subject. It also ignores the fact that being right means also being consistent – because right is consistently right, by its very nature.