I’d have gone with guns
In Chicago, police are handing out whistles to fight crime. Probably comes with a side of wishful thinking.
8 Responses to “I’d have gone with guns”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
December 18th, 2009 at 11:10 am
“help!” toot “Help!” toot, sounds better than “Stay Back!” blam blam blam?
December 18th, 2009 at 11:10 am
The police don’t need guns in Chicago. With their stringent gun control, criminals cannot get guns so the citizenry at large or the police do not need them either.
December 18th, 2009 at 11:38 am
Whistles are cheaper and easier than fighting crime.
December 18th, 2009 at 11:44 am
If you’re a thug and hear a whistle, will you be inclined to rush over and get a better place in line?
December 18th, 2009 at 12:42 pm
When cops replace their sidearms with whistles, then I will buy it.
December 18th, 2009 at 1:41 pm
Well the whistle is for after you’ve been robbed and your cellphone has been taken. And your lying in the street bleeding. I wonder if they include instructions for playing the funeral march?
December 18th, 2009 at 1:59 pm
Ah yes, the famous “rape whistles”. Back in the late 90’s, the University of Oregon used to have all the incoming frosh women attend an orientation where all sorts of scary data was taught about rape on campus (most of it bogus stats), and whistles were passed out.
December 19th, 2009 at 1:31 am
I wonder which the police will respond quicker to: a whistle, or gunfire? I’d say the sound of a .45 echoing down the ol’ urban canyons would be quite an attention-getter. (Better than any damn whistle I’ve ever heard…)