Ammo For Sale

« « Loopholes in I-594 | Home | To +P or not to +P » »

But 90% support expanded background checks

Except they don’t

6 Responses to “But 90% support expanded background checks”

  1. BDubya Says:

    Washington, since 1975, has been inundated by lefty progs from California, particularly the Puget Sound region and now Spokane.

    Anywhere the Democrat paradise is trying to be established, you get a Washington state.

    Note that wherever Microsoft doesn’t reach, folks are pretty much the same as when I left there in 1970; the leave me the Eff alone types.

  2. TheOtherLarry Says:

    Glad I moved out of there and into fly-over country. Washington is becoming Kalifornia North, which was one of the main reasons I left.

  3. Lyle Says:

    That map shows Whitman County as voting “yes” but as of today the ballots haven’t been counted. Just sayin’

  4. Guffaw Says:

    Background checks on my RIGHTS? I don’t THINK so!


  5. Ron W Says:

    Background checks on private sales of guns would violate the 4th and 5th Amendments. I thought liberals always supported those rights. But If not, “what goes around, comes around.”

  6. dustydog Says:

    When most people hear expanded background checks, they assume we are talking about:

    checking the backgrounds of US military officers, police forces, other emergency responders, power plant workers, people who work in secure areas of airports

    checking the backgrounds of teacher, teacher aides, doctors, nurses, and other health care professionals that work around children

    checking the background of bureaucrats, including the IRS, VA, CDC, judges, and candidates for elected office.

After several weeks of taking Viagra, I got used to it and took the drug only on the weekends. Noticing the changes, my girlfriend started to ask me why I'm so active on weekends. I had to honestly confess everything. She was not upset but supported me. So thanks to Viagra, I made sure that I'm loved just like the way I am.