Ammo For Sale

« « I hate when | Home | Everything Must Go – Update » »

For the laughs

Seen on the internet:


11 Responses to “For the laughs”

  1. Paul Kisling Says:

    Nah. They would just refine their search to exclude it.

  2. J.S.Bridges Says:

    Either that, or they’d list you for “special treatment/surveillance” as an obviously dangerous subversive, and then later send a SWAT team or two around to “have a chat” with you.

    It’d take ’em awhile, though – since none of them would recognize it for some time; it wasn’t apparently “required reading” in any of their Big Gummint Agent indoctrination classes.

  3. Old NFO Says:

    I would tend to agree with JS…

  4. MJM Says:

    Great twist!

  5. nk Says:


  6. happyfeet Says:


    no they would not.

    They would not start reading the Constitution even if you put it in your emails.

    And if they did they wouldn’t understand it.

    I have links.

  7. bobathome Says:

    Did you capitalize the “C” and lowercase the rest? If not, no problem. Carry on.

  8. comatus Says:

    Try it on a hockey mask. They’re into hockey.

  9. Austrian Anarchy Says:

    The other problem is the ones who do read it use all of the words wrong.

  10. CaptDMO Says:

    Also agree with JS
    Now, who was it that Janet Reno cited as persons of interest in “domestic” terrorism?
    Who’s on the IRS “keyword” list for “special” attention?

  11. Chas Says:

    They refuse to read it.
    Judge Skretny’s recent decision on the SAFE Act was consistent with a Second Amendment that reads, “…the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall be infringed.” He changed the magazine limit from 7 to 10, but 10 is still an infringement.
    As David Coder says, every day is opposite day with “Progressives”. “Shall not be infringed” now means “shall be infringed” according to a federal judge’s ruling.