Ammo For Sale

« « And in boycott NY news | Home | Like you and me, only better » »

In potential assault weapons ban news

A good review of some of the goings on in the senate: ‘Assault Weapon’ Banners Still Can’t Say What an ‘Assault Weapon’ Is. Hand guard, barrel shroud? What’s the diff?

Also, Feinstein says weapons she doesn’t approve are unnecessary ‘personal pleasures’. My rights to free speech and religion are also unnecessary ‘personal pleasures’.

5 Responses to “In potential assault weapons ban news”

  1. Michael Says:

    When will the kids realize that the left has gone full Puritain on us?

  2. comatus Says:

    She put her finger into the hole in Harvey Milk’s head, she told reporters. Someone needs to have a long talk with her, in a very public forum, on this ‘personal pleasures’ thing.

  3. Rob Crawford Says:

    Personal pleasures? Like marriages that could NEVER produce children?

  4. Mike Says:

    “My rights to free speech and religion are also unnecessary ‘personal pleasures’.”

    Don’t worry, they’re coming after those, too. ObamaCare, for sure, will take care of that pesky freedom-of-religion thing.

    I sure do hope they interview McCarthy again. Having learned her lesson about barrel shrouds, maybe this type she’ll say they are “…those shoulder things that go DOWN.”

  5. Bubblehead Les Says:

    IF they ever pass another Federal AWB, those of us who lived through the last one know that Owning a Banned Weapon or Magazine wasn’t Illegal under Federal Law. Just Damn Expensive.

    What we have to watch out for is Phase Two, where they try to make us turn them in after they are Banned.

    Stay Alert!