« « a typical July | Home | In Washington » »

12 Responses to “Dude, free bacon”

1. Weer'd Beard Says:
   August 23rd, 2010 at 9:04 am

   People can be such pussies sometimes. I’d imagine a quick out for a pig that was surrendered for god-knows what reasons is probably better than living in a shelter until somebody gives it the needle.

   Also if not raised properly pigs can be really aggressive, so this is also good for the shelter staff who might suffer hoof-scratches, and tusk rakes at the hands of a surly pig.

2. Les Jones Says:
   August 23rd, 2010 at 9:12 am

   Based on the article there might be legitimate concerns – depends on whether the article is accurate, natch. Some people expressed interest in adopting the pig. Meanwhile, the employee has a conflict of interest – is he looking out for the best interests of the animal or the best interest of his belly?

3. Boondoggie Says:
   August 23rd, 2010 at 9:39 am

   I wonder how many of the shocked people in the community enjoy bacon and pork chops from the supermarket.

4. Spook45 Says:
   August 23rd, 2010 at 10:19 am

   Well, at least wasnt a POODLE! This is whats wrong with people today. They are so fucked up they think that the animals have more rights than humans. We NEED this depresion to make people more self sufficiant again and make them GLAD To eat the pig instead of feeling sorry for it. Shotgun, rifle, four wheel drive….well, you know the rest.

5. Dave Says:
   August 23rd, 2010 at 10:33 am

   Rules were broken. Folks who wanted to take the animal in as a pet were denied because someone wanted lots of free bacon. Sounds to me like someone is going to lose their job.
   Times being like they are, I’d have kept the job and bought my bacon at the store.

6. Matt Groom Says:
   August 23rd, 2010 at 10:47 am

   “OH MY GOD! YOU ATE MY PET CANDY BAR! HOW COULD YOU EAT FOOD LIKE THAT? YOU HEARTLESS, INSENSITIVE BEAST!!!”

   If people choose to raise food as pets instead of having children, and then decide to get rid of their food/pet because it refused to move out when it turned 18, they shouldn’t be surprised when somebody more realistic and practical than themselves decides to eat their food. I mean, “pet”.

   5000 years ago, eating other humans wasn’t considered that strange or unusual. We can easily regress back to those times in relatively short order. The idea that eating an animal is unacceptable because we have more food than we can make good use of it stupid.

7. dustydog Says:
   August 23rd, 2010 at 10:53 am

   The only surprising thing is that there weren’t already rules in place making what he did legal and ok. Oversight on some bureaucrat’s part.

   When a new book comes into the library, the librarian gets first dibs on checking it out.

8. stencil Says:
   August 23rd, 2010 at 11:42 am

   What greater benefit to the homeless than to assimilate them? Plus, when a pig has “behavior problems” it’s a major menace; those who “expressed interest” in acquiring it would probably have ended up bringing it back.
   .

9. Standard Mischief Says:
   August 23rd, 2010 at 12:53 pm

   Although the pig was killed in June, the incident report wasn’t issued until August 6th. “Part of the reason we are investigating the situation is to determine exactly what the timeline was and should people in management have been made aware of this situation sooner than they were made aware,” said Lovett.

   Plenty of time to get rid of cure, smoke and eat any incriminating evidence.

10. mikee Says:
    August 23rd, 2010 at 5:54 pm

    Prove I ate it. (Burp)

11. Dave Says:
    August 23rd, 2010 at 6:26 pm

    The worth of having a pig as a pet aside ( I don’t make friends with bacon either btw) he stole the pig. Steal stuff from work, you lose your job. Seems pretty simple to me. Maybe there should be a rule that allows workers to take the unwanted yet tasty animals. That rule isn’t in place yet, so our pork loving friend is a thief at this point in time.
    Debating about what might or should have happened with the pig is extra gravy, pardon the pun.

12. SteveA Says:
    August 23rd, 2010 at 11:32 pm

    The article says the pig had behavioral problems. So it didn’t matter how many people wanted to adopt it, from a legal standpoint they couldn’t take the risk to adopt it out. This would have opened them up to a lawsuit if the pig hurt anyone.

    Now with that out of the way . . . Pass the bacon!!

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges Your Location:

Categories

• ATF (769)
• Death Match (10)
• Eminent Domain (225)
• In the bag (9)
• Notes to Junior (546)
• Poker (74)
• Recipes (142)
• Shotgun Noob (11)
• The Airing of Grievances (19)
• uncategorized (47,725)

Archives

Select Month August 2023 June 2022 March 2022 December 2021 August 2021 February 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 October 1971