The War on three-dimensional devices designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs
Ahem, there’s no E in the plural of dildo.
8 Responses to “The War on three-dimensional devices designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
February 13th, 2008 at 12:53 pm
If it turns out that the government can ban dildos, where are they going to put people like Josh Sugarmann and Alexander T Riley?
February 13th, 2008 at 6:13 pm
So … would a dildo modeled on a non-human ( say, Homo Neandethalis ) be legal?
February 13th, 2008 at 6:17 pm
Kristopher, apparently so. I seem to recall that some devices are used to stimulate the genital organs of animals and those are necessary for certain types of farming.
February 13th, 2008 at 7:53 pm
E Pluribus Dildo? Oh… I misread. You typed something else.
February 14th, 2008 at 12:10 am
Dildos? No, it’s “Dildoes”, and Dan Quayle told me so.
Nyah, Nyah, Nyah.
February 14th, 2008 at 12:21 am
Now why do they want to ban them? DAMN IT!! They are trying to take away all the things that I like. First guns…now this!!??
DAMN IT!!!!!!!!!!
February 14th, 2008 at 10:19 am
The texas ban was overturned today …
February 16th, 2008 at 12:32 pm
Kristopher, it says “designed to STIMulate human genital organs,” not “designed to SIMulate human genital organs”!