I’ve had something similar happen. In 2010 they tried to bring up something from 2001.

Then in 2011 they went back 10 full years and tried to claim I owed them $160k in underpayment, based on their estimation of me filing the standard deduction, being single, no house, no kids etc…

Except of course I’m a small business owner, with a wife, a house, 3 kids…

We theoretically resolved the issue in my favor in 2012.

I just got two packets of crap from them that they want again…

Suggestion: The next time anybody demands a right to a license of any kind, respond that rights are not licensed.

Won’t pat the CPA or lawyer bills, though. We need a “loser pays” system with the IRS.

What happened to all of the retarded people? Where did all of these “Intellectually Disabled” people come from? To me, Intellectually Disabled” easily translates to “Politician” which I am fairly certain a number of them abandon themslves in bars all the time.

Hmm; you don’t suppose the teachers’ union would defend the guy by asserting his second amendment rights…..Naw. It’ll never happen.

When I first saw the headline; “Teacher found with unloaded gun…” I figured that, yes, he should be disciplined for not having it loaded. What the hell good is an unloaded gun? That’s like having a fire extinguisher with no charge in it, or a seatbelt with no buckle.

You can be convicted of DUI even if you were not present at the crime.

Hey Nagel! Not. Helping.

Sadly we truly are becoming a state of laws.

Should have been laws. A law to cover every possible contingency.

It’s not good to abandon somebody helpless — but there should be some well-defined way to transfer custody to somebody else, perhaps the legislature that passed this law.

But I come from the School of Thought that the 2A is probably the most “Equal” of ALL the Rights listed in the Constitution. Trigger Fingers are Neutral.

A) So depending on how well his Union backs him up, this guy may/may not ever have a Job teaching again. But he did break the current Law, and Actions have Consequences.

B) But at the bottom of the page, we find out that that even though the State passed a Law ALLOWING each School District the Authority to have Armed Employees on Campus, all 7 members of the Wichita School Board refuse to have that Security Measure in THEIR School District.

C) Methinks the Good Citizens need to have a School Board “Regime Change,” before some Psycho decides “Hey! A Whole School of Little Targets! Maybe I can beat the Newtown Score!”

Four Replacements should do it.

“The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.” – Roman Historian, Cornelius Tacitus, Annals III 27

1. DUI by Consent is statutory in Tennessee, it’s in the criminal code;
2. Voluntary intoxication is not a defense to any crime, if it were only Mormons would go to jail;
3. The lady is not being charged as an accessory, DUI by consent is a stand alone crime, see one above.

They really think this is acutally anti-gay propaganda.

Man Oleg’d make their heads explode.

At least it’s better than the Think Progress bloggers mooning over that with the support of the gay bashers they might get some “sensible” gun control.

We’re supposed to be a nation of laws

Sadly we truly are becoming a state of laws. TS

Whadaya know? My 1851 Colt percussion revolver uses rotating chambers with caseless, and consumable case, ammo. The original Sharps breechloader used “in-line, push-through” consumable envelope cartridges.

I always thought that the new-fangled, metal cartridges all the kids are using were a passing fad.

When I pasted those lines into the comment, it changed the double quotes around “STORE_MSG” and “block” into single quotes (probably something in the comment engine to prevent hacking). Try changing those and it should work.

“…McCain acts stupid, drools on self, poops a little.” And?

/*
Exception: illegal character
@Scratchpad/2:10
*/

Not sure what I did wrong

Yet another reason why there should not be a registry for any arms.

This. The fact that this map is even possible should be offensive to anyone who cares about liberty.

As with any criminal charge, the culpable mental state is important, and it sounds like the lady was not capable of forming intent because she was severely impaired. The most she could be charged with criminally, and it would be a stretch, is recklessly loaning her car, if that can even be made into a crime. Civilly, she’s toast, of course.

“DUII by consent” sounds like something the trooper and/or the reporter pulled out of their hoo-hoo.

(Do these idiots not realize that all those pension funds for their precious Public Employees – not to mention everyone else’s either pension fund or 401(k) or whatnot – are invested in farkin’ stocks?

Maybe they don’t. And I blame decades of mindless “anti-corporate” indoctrination and rhetoric.

[Not that a "corporation" is automatically right or good - but equally they're not wrong and bad, axiomatically.]

Fools. None of them seems to know anything about how wealth is actually created.)

Listen to their rhetoric when tax cuts are discussed. They talk about whether government can “afford” them. Apparently all of your earnings belong to the government, and what you take home is a government expense.

var e = document.getElementById(‘STORE_MSG’);
e.style.display = ‘block’;

Then press CTRL-R to run it.

Personally, I’m enjoying the Schadenfreude.

You are correct. What would be more revealing is a chart of NFA weapons adjusted for population.

In those days, country swains used to get into town by yoking two or three horses, and jumping from horseback to horseback at full gallop — sort of the Golden Age equivalent to blipping two Holleys on a big-block.

I’m leaving the Sunfire angle right out of it. Even the ancients knew not to fly too close to those.

Somewhat off on a tangent, there have been a number of cases lately of drunk teens having sex. In every case, the drunk boys were either charged with some kind of sex crime or there was widespread outrage if they weren’t, but the drunk girls were considered victims, too impaired to consent.

We’re supposed to be a nation of laws, and of equal protection under the law. We need one uniform standard as to whether someone who is drunk or stoned should be held accountable for their actions.

Not that it’s going to stop them from doing it anyway. :/

How can a drunk determine how drunk another drunk is?

That is most likely how the lawyer will handle the defense of her case if the lawyer is any good.

The drunk passenger gave her car keys to another drunk, and consented to that drunk driving her car.

Frigging Illinois….

That’s what I thought, too, then I remembered Class III dealers and dealer samples.

Vicarious liability for DWI.

OR

Bureau of Artifice and Two Faced Equivicators

That is all,

Disavowed With Honor

Frigging Illinois….

First in teaching him that they (just like chainsaws, tractors, lawnmowers, toaster ovens and lots of other things) can be dangerous if not given the proper respect. Then by showing him how to treat these items and that benefit (even if only “fun”) can be derived by properly harnessing these (potentially) dangerous devices.

Bonus for sharing these insigths with the teacher, and now the entire internet!

An excellent thing. IMHO. My front entryway is rather narrow, but if one has a door wide enough to give a good view of the platoon of neighborhood residents, the squad of lawyers, and the draggle of reporters from the local dailies and TV stations, it may give the bluebellies and bureauc rats pause.