Archive for the 'Taxes' Category
November 11, 2009
Be a good little subject
Or an enemy of the people:
It’s official. The Joint Tax Committee informs us that under the terms of the Pelosi health-care bill, “Americans who do not maintain acceptable health insurance coverage and who choose not to pay the bill’s new individual mandate tax (generally 2.5% of income), are subject to numerous civil and criminal penalties, including criminal fines of up to $250,000 and imprisonment of up to five years.”
|33 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
November 03, 2009
Loaner
This is one of the scariest things I’ve ever seen. Cali is increasing withholdings by 10%. But it’s OK because it’s not a tax increase. See, they’re just borrowing money from you. And will pay it back. Oh and you don’t have a choice in the matter. After all, who would willingly loan money to an organization in the financial shape California is in?
|8 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
October 28, 2009
First Cali
|6 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
September 25, 2009
Even he can see that
NY Governor:
“You heard the mantra, ‘Tax the rich, tax the rich,”‘ Paterson said Wednesday at a gathering of newspaper editors at an Associated Press event in Syracuse. “We’ve done that. We’ve probably lost jobs and driven people out of the state.”
|3 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
July 24, 2009
They even found a way to tax taxes.
|5 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
July 17, 2009
the infrastructure is there
A criminal enterprise already exists to evade the law. As long as it’s profitable to avoid tax payments, that enterprise will continue even if the product is now legal.
|1 Comment | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
July 06, 2009
Protest
|5 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
July 01, 2009
We’re number 12
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
June 19, 2009
Capital idea
Les Jones on the story behind the subpoena for anonymous posters:
The case involved Robert Kahre, a Las Vegas businessman who paid his contract employees in gold and silver U.S. coins. The employees then paid taxes based on the face value of the coins, rather than their much greater worth as bullion. The difference can be considerable. A $50 U.S. gold coin contains one troy ounce of gold, which currently fetches over $900.
The IRS sued Kahre and some of his contract employees, essentially claiming that taxes should be based on the actual value of the coins, rather than their face value. Which tends to raise an obvious question. A $50 bill has a real value of essentially nothing since it’s only good for lining a bird cage, so can I get paid in $50 bills and not owe any taxes?
|12 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
May 14, 2009
Shocking
Maryland decides to raise money by taxing millionaires. Millionaires respond by leaving.
|6 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
April 15, 2009
Fark with the snark
Heh: IRS claiming to see large rise in income tax delinquencies, people listing “Obama Administration Cabinet Member” as their occupation
|1 Comment | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
Ides of April
It’s a big day.
It’s tax rage day.
Buy a gun day.
And I hear there are some protests going on. Details for the one in Knoxville here.
Sadly, I’ll only be participating in the first one.
|3 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
March 25, 2009
Well, they have to fill those 20,000 pages with something
|3 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
March 13, 2009
Taxes
Indeed:
If Whoopi Goldberg is getting up in arms about tax increases then this movement is crossing all kinds of lines.
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
March 03, 2009
Hope and change
Obama to hide truth about Bush’s warrantless wire taps. Of course he is. He wants to use them too.
Also, Obama appoints another tax cheat: Ron Kirk.
It’s gone beyond funny to officially pathetic. Taxes are, apparently, just for the little people.
|2 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
February 12, 2009
Not that complicated
In comments at AC’s, Sean Braisted says:
The tax code isn’t all that complicated unless you try to get all the deductions possible.
Yeah, those 6.6 billion hours spent per year on them are because math is hard. And the $194 billion per year in compliance costs is because it’s not all that complicated. And the 117 million times per year that IRS is contacted for answers is not due to complexities in the code. And that code consisting of 693 sections of the Internal Revenue Code that are applicable to individual taxpayers, 1,501 sections applicable to businesses, and 445 sections applicable to tax-exempt organizations, employee plans, and governments. And the Treasury Department had issued almost 20,000 pages of regulations containing over 8 million words.
But, no, it’s not all that complicated. Just ask Daschle, Geithner, Rangle, Solis, and Killefer.
Sources for my tax stats, which are dated and, therefore, understated.
|45 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
Tax Preparation
Both TN senators declined to answer the following questions:
Do you prepare your own taxes?
If not, who does?
Have you or the IRS ever discovered an error on a tax return you’ve filed?
Have you ever paid back taxes?
If the answer to either 3 or 4 is yes, please explain.
I’m not one to generally say There ought to be a law. But there ought to be a law. I think Congressmonkies should be required, by law, to do their own tax returns. And the process should be videotaped. I imagine the tax code would get much simpler.
|10 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
February 10, 2009
31%
The Geek presents his Tax Rage Pie, of which Michelle Obama wants a bigger piece.
|3 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
February 09, 2009
I can’t believe we didn’t elect this guy
John Kerry says the trouble with tax cuts is that it gives all the little people freedom to do with that money what they want. Can’t have that. The government should decide what to do with your money.
|1 Comment | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
February 06, 2009
Another tax cheat
Once again, an Obama appointee is busted for not paying taxes. No wonder Democrats don’t mind raising taxes. They don’t pay them. Interestingly, Glenn notes:
Is this, like, some kind of karmic payback for all the Joe-the-plumber tax business?
I was sort of thinking that a lot of this has come out since Joe. And I know the press is lazy when it comes to asking hard questions of Obama and I’d bet they’re not the ones discovering this. I wonder, then, if someone learned after the Joe The Plumber incident to just start searching public records for anyone who enters the political arena and then to leak it?
|2 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
February 04, 2009
We’re Number One
Just about every time Tennessee makes #1 on some list, it’s for something dumb. Today’s is that we have the country’s highest tax on beer.
Via AC who says: Now, Don’t Go Doing Anything Stupid Like Dressing Up Like Indians And Pouring A Bunch Into The Cumberland. That is stupid. The steps of the capitol is a much better location.
|4 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
Under the bus: Popular spot
Do any of these people pay taxes?
And Daschle.
Oh, and Geithner doesn’t like to pay taxes either but he’s not rooming under the bus. He makes mistakes and blames Turbo Tax. And others make mistakes too.
And PGP notes that while Obama was vetting gun owners from his cabinet, maybe he should have asked if they were tax cheats.
|2 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
February 02, 2009
Explains it
The general stupidity of the raise taxes crowd has always amazed me. Now it makes sense. In light of recent events, it is clear that those who advocate tax increases do so because they’re not going to pay taxes anyway. Funny how it’s always because of ‘errors’.
|3 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
January 20, 2009
Letter from the owner of a business
A Boss Who Tells it Like it Is …
To All My Valued Employees,
There have been some rumblings around the office about the future of this company, and more specifically, your job. As you know, the economy has changed for the worse and presents many challenges. However, the good news is this: The economy doesn’t pose a threat to your job. What does threaten your job however, is the changing political landscape in this country. However, let me tell you some little tidbits of fact which might help you decide what is in your best interests.
Read the rest of this entry »
|16 Comments | Link to this post | By #9 |
December 24, 2008
Good deed gets punished
A man notices that he wasn’t charged sales tax. He does the right thing and remits his tax ($1.50) to the Department of Revenue. The DOR then said he was a business and had to pay a 650 dollar fine—or face collections —AND criminal charges. It took an inquiry from the local news media to get it straightened out.
Incompetent big government, money grubbing pricks: making the world more libertarian one government form filled out in triplicate, shuffled, and stuffed in a bin no one ever reviews at a time.
|1 Comment | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
December 17, 2008
OK by me
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
November 19, 2008
In Poker News
Another look at the WSOP and taxes. Eastgate has moved to London, possibly to avoid the ridiculous tax.
In other news, regulators have simply given up trying to enforce Bill Frist’s onerous Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act.
|1 Comment | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
November 13, 2008
Holy Crap
You may have heard that Peter Eastgate won the 2008 World Series Of Poker. Actually, it looks like the real winner was Denmark:
Denmark’s tax agency is called SKAT. Denmark, like the United States, does tax gambling winnings. For casino gambling (which is where I believe this will be classified) the tax rate is 45% on the first 4 million Danish Kroners; it’s 75% on income above that. Today $1 is worth 5.88907 DKK; Mr. Eastgate won 53,899,250.70 DKK before taxes. Mr. Eastgate will owe about 39,224,438 DKK in tax ($6,660,545). Put another way Mr. Eastgate will keep 14,674,813 DKK ($2,491,871) of his winnings—just 27.23% of his prize. Yes, he faces an effective tax rate of 72.77%. Ouch.
Wow.
Meanwhile, former commies have a flat tax:
Russia has a 13% flat tax rate, so Mr. Demidov will owe about $755,247 to the State Taxation Service of Russia.
From reader BWM.
|12 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
November 05, 2008
More good election news
In The City (My The City):
Blount Countians voted strongly against a half-cent sales tax increase Tuesday.
The countywide referendum was defeated by nearly 13,000 votes with 30,871 people voting against it and 18,124 people supporting it, according to unofficial returns.
Good.
Past coverage here.
|1 Comment | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
October 29, 2008
Taxing Birdwatching
Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency is looking into it:
But wildlife watching in Tennessee – which doesn’t require a license – is on the rise. TWRA is pitching an idea to tax non-hunters through small fees for trailer license plates, new fees to visit managed lands or by taxing products like bird seed.
|2 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
October 15, 2008
About Those Tax Plans
Earlier today, Uncle wrote:
I can’t find where taxes are lower for anyone under Obama’s plan.
If that’s true, then he’s not looking or not paying attention. See the non-partisan Tax Policy Center’s report (PDF) on the two candidates tax plans. In particular, note Figure 1 on page 41 — for the bottom four quintiles, both candidates cut taxes, but the average increase in after-tax income as compared to current law is much larger under Obama’s plan than it is under McCain’s:

Read the rest of this entry »
|21 Comments | Link to this post | By tgirsch |
Spreading the wealth
Sean Braisted is all butt-hurt because Obama’s handlers didn’t have a tight hold on the lead and he said From each according to his ability, to each according to his need. No, that’s not cool. Cool is I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody. Sean then spins it as a tax policy that benefits the middle class. That, of course, is bullshit. I can’t find where taxes are lower for anyone under Obama’s plan.
Of course, some just steal it.
|2 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
October 08, 2008
Smackdown of the Week, 2008-10-07
[For the hostile audience here at SayUncle, perhaps I should call it my "flaming bag of poo of the week."]
This week, it comes from NYT Columnist Thomas Friedman:
Criticizing Sarah Palin is truly shooting fish in a barrel. But given the huge attention she is getting, you can’t just ignore what she has to say. And there was one thing she said in the debate with Joe Biden that really sticks in my craw. It was when she turned to Biden and declared: “You said recently that higher taxes or asking for higher taxes or paying higher taxes is patriotic. In the middle class of America, which is where Todd and I have been all of our lives, that’s not patriotic.”
What an awful statement. Palin defended the government’s $700 billion rescue plan. She defended the surge in Iraq, where her own son is now serving. She defended sending more troops to Afghanistan. And yet, at the same time, she declared that Americans who pay their fair share of taxes to support all those government-led endeavors should not be considered patriotic.
I only wish she had been asked: “Governor Palin, if paying taxes is not considered patriotic in your neighborhood, who is going to pay for the body armor that will protect your son in Iraq? Who is going to pay for the bailout you endorsed? If it isn’t from tax revenues, there are only two ways to pay for those big projects — printing more money or borrowing more money. Do you think borrowing money from China is more patriotic than raising it in taxes from Americans?” That is not putting America first. That is selling America first.
Sorry, I grew up in a very middle-class family in a very middle-class suburb of Minneapolis, and my parents taught me that paying taxes, while certainly no fun, was how we paid for the police and the Army, our public universities and local schools, scientific research and Medicare for the elderly. No one said it better than Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: “I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization.”
I can understand someone saying that the government has no business bailing out the financial system, but I can’t understand someone arguing that we should do that but not pay for it with taxes. I can understand someone saying we have no business in Iraq, but I can’t understand someone who advocates staying in Iraq until “victory” declaring that paying taxes to fund that is not patriotic.
How in the world can conservative commentators write with a straight face that this woman should be vice president of the United States? Do these people understand what serious trouble our country is in right now?
H/T: KTK at Lean Left
|55 Comments | Link to this post | By tgirsch |
September 23, 2008
Revenue Cameras
Red light cameras do not improve safety. No surprise. They’ve never been about safety and only about dollars.
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
September 19, 2008
unto Caesar
So, VP candidate Biden first said that paying taxes was patriotic. It’s also a good way not to have your life ruined by the IRS. In defending the comment, he said paying taxes is next to Godliness:
“Catholic social doctrine as I was taught it is, you take care of people who need the help the most,” he said. “Now it’d be different if you could make the case to me that by giving this tax cut to the very wealthy, everybody else was going to be better off. We saw what happened the last eight years when we gave that tax cut.”
However, Biden doesn’t look to take care of people, according to his tax returns. Money talks.
|7 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
September 17, 2008
IRS seizes money from innocent
Anyone who is surprised by this has obviously never dealt with the Internal Revenue Service:
The IRS has acknowledged that Jamey and Lora Costner of Newport are victims of identity theft and Congress has called on them to testify. Nevertheless, this young couple are being harassed yet again by the IRS for back taxes on income they never earned at a place they never worked (Koch Foods). This time, the feds have already taken $467 from Lora Costner’s $401K fund to pay the debt they don’t owe.
The monkeys push the buttons. It doesn’t matter if you have a valid concern, legitimate reason or other issue. IRS collects. The monkey just pushes the buttons.
|2 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
July 18, 2008
Tax-free guns
In South Carolina: On those two days, South Carolina will waive collection of its 6 percent sales tax on the purchase of handguns, rifles and shotguns.
|1 Comment | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
May 07, 2008
iPod Tax
Been a bit of an issue in the state. Terry and AC have the info on it. Campfield sums it up thusly: Farr illegally collected the Ipod tax before he found out he couldn’t collect the tax but he still collected the tax until he can pass a bill allowing him to collect the tax.
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
April 30, 2008
Sales Tax Holiday
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
Tank of gas
Barack Ernest P. Worrell Obama gets one right noting that a temporary gas tax break won’t amount to much. So, I’m all for eliminating the tax permanently.
|1 Comment | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
April 25, 2008
IPod Tax
It’s already here. Or should be. I don’t see that they collect it.
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
February 12, 2008
Good for Corker
He knows vote buying when he sees it:
“I think it’s short-sighted,” Corker said. “This economic stimulus plan costs over $150 billion and will have a negligible effect on the situation. All it does is create favor for politicians.
|2 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
February 08, 2008
EBR sales to go up
So, it looks as though congress has voted to buy votes with money borrowed from the people they’re giving it back to. Or something. Anyway, it’s a bunch of crap. Regardless, KDT is advocating those that get some bling back go buy an Evil Black Rifle.
|14 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
February 07, 2008
Good
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
January 28, 2008
.gov advocacy
|2 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
January 25, 2008
Tax on hope
Tennessee’s tax on people who can’t do math is a disaster?
|3 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
January 24, 2008
Stimulate this
So, the powers that be spending your money have decided that the economy needs to be stimulated. Remember when you got the $300 check? You might get one again. Is it an election year? They’re gonna refund you some of your own walking around money. Don’t get me wrong, I want my money back. IIRC, last time you didn’t actually get it back. You got it, claimed it on your returns, and were taxed on it. Dunno if this is the same thing or not. If it is, this is just stupid.
Additionally, there will be tax breaks for businessess. Hey, they’re onto something now.
And the .gov backed lenders will have their cap on lending raised.
And they’re gonna extend the amount of time people can draw unemployment.
Whoopie! We are saved.
So, here’s the question: If the government can stimulate the economy and that is allegedly good for the economy, why don’t they do it every day?
Need a hint?
The government can’t control the economy. They’re a player in it, of course, but it’s beyond their control. Period. If they could control it, we’d never have depressions, recessions, inflation, stagnation and all those other -essions and -ations. The .gov also cannot control unemployment, other than to the extent that they hire people. Period.
The only controls over the economy they truly have are tax rates. And the impacts of those are debatable.
|20 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
January 19, 2008
November 29, 2007
November 26, 2007
Simple
|4 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
October 18, 2007
Exodus
About half the folks in New Jersey want to leave. Well, don’t come here. I’ve seen what happens when you vote.
Update: I guess they could be chosen by God.
|8 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
September 18, 2007
The War On Poker continues
Noted Poker Authority Ed Miller notes that the IRS has issued a bulletin stating that effective March 2008, tournament directors are to withhold taxes from tournament winnings. The impacts on poker tournaments (notably satellites) would be substantial. But, then, that is the point. To make it hard to play poker.
|2 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
August 06, 2007
Remember last campaign season when politicians said they’d do something about high gas prices?
|4 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
June 22, 2007
Thanks, County
Unreal:
In a year when Senator Kyle says taxpayers should demand lower property taxes AND in a year that Blount County will receive almost $1 million more in State funds, Blount County Commissioners are going to require Blount County taxpayers to take EVEN More money from their family budgets.
I wonder what blogging Blount County Commissioner Wendy will say. She did vote No and hats off to her.
|2 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
June 18, 2007
Fed tax revenue at all time high
|8 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
June 12, 2007
What the Hell is happening to my state?
A loss for property rights in Tennessee:
Governor Bredesen on Monday signed into law a measure to extinguish most workplace smoking in Tennessee.
The law will go into effect in July, but the ban will not be enforced until October to give businesses time to comply. The ban would apply to most businesses, including restaurants.
Exclusions include bars or restaurants that prohibit people under 21 years old at all times, businesses employing no more than three workers and retail tobacco stores.
The market has pretty much instituted the same rules and has done a fine job regulating smoking. Where do they allow smoking in Tennessee other than bars? But someone who owns a business should decide what otherwise lawful activities they allow in that business. We don’t need big brother making those decisions.
Additionally, it looks the state can now build toll roads:
A bill to allow the state to build its first modern toll roads passed the state Senate today by a 20-10 vote.
The Tennessee Department of Transportation would be authorized to develop two pilot toll road projects — one road project and one bridge project — under the legislation. The House is scheduled to vote on the bill during its session at 5 p.m. today.
So, in years of record surpluses, our congress monkeys decide to allow the state to build toll roads. And, of course, the increase in cigarette taxes also corresponds to record surpluses. When there’s a shortfall, they need to tax. When there’s a surplus, they need to tax.
To my fellow Tennesseans: vote every one of these morons out.
|16 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
May 29, 2007
Can you imagine what they’d be up to if there weren’t surpluses?
Looks like toll roads are being looked into again for Tennessee:
While charging for highway access has been a common way to fund road building and maintenance in much of the country, most of the South has resisted the trend.
But that could change as federal funding for road projects dries up and states try to ward off gas-tax increases amid spiking fuel costs.
Tennessee has had substantial surpluses. Yet, they’re looking into this, increasing cigarette taxes (while also looking to ban smoking – and that’s just stupid), and taxing your propane for grilling. Even when they’re fat and happy, it’s not enough.
I say no thanks.
|3 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
Record surpluses = tax increases
This time, our governor wants to tax propane. As in the kind used this weekend to grill out by everyone. Ya know, I really liked Bredesen (voted for him twice) until he started this tax raising nonsense.
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
May 24, 2007
Is the lottery a tax?
Ben wants to know. I think:
It’s a tax on hope.
It’s a tax on people who can’t do math.
It’s a tax people actually stand in line willingly to pay.
|7 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
May 09, 2007
Revolting
Tennessee Tax Revolt:
Dont BURN it, RETURN it. The Knoxville News Sentinel is reporting that WE, the TAXPAYERS overpaid our taxes by $1.3 billion in this budget year. In their words, the “State will have money to burn.” This is OUR Money and we should get part of this overpayment back!! We have heard rumors that they are talking about giving less than $100 million back to the taxpayers in the form of a temporary reduction in food taxes. This is UNACCEPTABLE. We have overpaid by $1.3 billion. The refund should be AT LEAST $400 million.
Please act TODAY and Click HERE to EMAIL Speaker Naifeh, Speaker Ramsey, and Governor Bredesen. The General Assembly will be making the final decision on the State Budget in the next few weeks. Make sure the taxpayer’s voice is heard. Tell them Don’t Burn it, Return it.
|11 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
May 03, 2007
Auditing poker players
Noted Poker Authority Ed Miller issues a warning that the IRS may target online gamblers for audits.
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
April 25, 2007
Quote of the day
TN Representative Chris Crider:
Tennesseans, my constituents, have overpaid taxes by almost $1 billion. I don’t know about everyone else, but I know when I overpay a bill, I expect a refund.
There’s a push now to use the excess collections to offset taxes on food. Giving us our money back? Novel concept.
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
April 05, 2007
Esqueeze me?
Did he really just call him Hitler?
BTW, AC has a good read on the tax on spanking your monkey. And, speaking of the tax on punching the clown, Terry Frank has more. And since we’re discussing rubbing one out, the story has made the national news.
So, do you beat it like Michael Jackson or like it owes you money?
In other news, I know a lot of euphemisms for choking your chicken.
|3 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
April 04, 2007
More on the stupid porn bill
Campfield notes that:
The porn not corn tax bill came out of the first sub committee but was given a negative recommendation. The sub committee was made up of three people Joe Haynes(D), Douglas Henry(D) and Diane Black(R). The negative vote was given by Haynes and Henry. Diane Black was for the bill.
Good. It’s a really stupid bill.
|2 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
March 30, 2007
Porn Free
Looks like Stacey Campfield’s tax on masturbation is heading to committee:
This bill will tax porn and porn items (things you have to be over 18 years old to view or purchase),strip clubs and escort services. The tax would raise 50 million dollars and would be dedicated to allow the state to drop the sales tax on whole foods (Foods that are more healthy, fruits, vegetables, non processed meats and non processed canned goods,ect.) down to one percent in year one and down to zero in year two. The estimated drop in porn sales is only 3%.
I’m gonna go ahead and call the $50M bogus. Did someone do a porn study? A strip club study? Show me the numbers, man. Estimated drop of 3%? Want to bet?
And, you know, porn is free on Al Gore’s Internets.
|3 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
March 29, 2007
Well, we’d hate to spend our surplus on that
Bredesen is exploring toll roads to pay for TDOT. This is despite TN’s surplus. Let me be the first to say fuck that. Toll roads are inconvenient, delay traffic, require me to keep change/method of payment in my car, and are generally a pain in the ass. Here’s an idea: use the surplus or cut spending.
|21 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
March 27, 2007
SayUncle v. Professional Privilege Taxes – updated
The story so far. A new twist to the tale of me and my privilege to be allowed to engage in my chosen profession. The latest conversation:
SayUncle: Hello
Tax Collector: This is blah-blah-blah from the waivers department calling about your request for a waiver for penalties on your Professional Privilege Tax payment.
SayUncle: You have a waivers department?
Tax Collector: Yes.
SayUncle: Odd. So, you have an entire department dedicated to the fact you guys make a lot of mistakes.
Tax Collector: Sir?
SayUncle: Nothing. How can I help you, ma’am?
Tax Collector: Well, we show your address as [old address from a number of years back] and I have this letter from you requesting a waiver.
SayUncle: I no longer live there. Like I told the last guy, I let you guys know that via your handy little website that exists expressly for the purpose of letting you know that.
Tax Collector: We need to get your current address.
SayUncle: Well, on that letter that you have, just below the words I can be reached at.
Tax Collector: Yeah.
SayUncle: Well, you’ll notice that the first line ends in the word Road and the second line, oddly enough, ends in a five digit number. We commonly call that a zip-code. It typically indicates that, uh, that would be an address.
Tax Collector: *silence*
SayUncle: It also matches the top left portion of that thing it came in. You know, an envelope?
Tax Collector: So your current address is?
SayUncle: My address is blah-blah-blah.
Tax Collector: Thank you, sir.
SayUncle: Have a good day.
Wow. Just wow.
|4 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
March 11, 2007
Taxes
Doing them today. Feh. Waste of a nice, warm Sunday. Fuckers.
Update: Wow. First time I’ve gotten a refund in years and years. I was amazed and didn’t know why. Then it occurred to me that I did spend the first half of the year unemployed. Guess that explains it.
|5 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
March 04, 2007
Taxes
Doing them today. It sucks.
|6 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
March 02, 2007
SayUncle v. Professional Privilege Taxes
Phone rings. It’s the Tennessee Department of Finance and revenue. Seems that I am delinquent in paying my 2006 professional privilege tax. See, as a licensed member of a particular profession, I must pay to the state $400 per year. Conversation went something like this:
Tax Collector: Yeah, we’ve been trying to collect this tax plus penalties and interest for several months now. The new total comes to $539.
SayUncle: Did you send me a bill?
Tax Collector: Yes and a final payment notice.
SayUncle: Where’d you send it?
Tax Collector: [reads old address from two houses ago]
SayUncle: Yeah, I don’t live there any more. Haven’t for a while. I let you guys know that via your handy little website that exists expressly for the purpose of letting you know that.
Tax Collector: Oh.
SayUncle: And I thought the tax was every two years?
Tax Collector: It’s yearly.
SayUncle: So, any way, you’re going to charge me additional money due to your inability to check your own website? Doesn’t seem right. $100 in penalties and $39 interest is awful steep. That’s like, what, 18% interest?
Tax Collector: Err, I just have a computer printout . . .
SayUncle: Isn’t that, like, usury? Or, you know, pretty close? Are there laws against that?
Tax Collector: Well, we need to collect your tax . . .
SayUncle: So, can I request a waiver? After all, you guys seemed to put forth a rather lackluster effort to actually find me. I don’t really think I should have to pay for your error. You got phone books?
Tax Collector: Well, you can request a waiver for the penalties but the state’s policy is that we can’t waive the interest. I’ll need a formal letter requesting the waiver and a check for $439
SayUncle: So, no matter what, I gotta pay for something that is, in fact, beyond my control and through no fault of my own.
Tax Collector: Err . . .
SayUncle: Unbelievable.
|20 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
March 01, 2007
This again
Looks like my home county mayor wants to enact a wheel tax. If we pass it, it’s free money, he says. I think Jerry Cunningham needs a class on economics.
We go through this every few years. As with most things government, it’s not the revenue side that’s a problem. It’s the spending.
More from R. Neal here.
|4 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
January 30, 2007
Fight the power
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
January 26, 2007
Paging Stacey Campfield
Mr. Campfield, it seems there’s another way to get rid of the tax on food instead of ill-conceived platitudes designed to garner publicity. Seems the state of Tennessee makes too much bling:
So, for the 12 months of Fiscal year 05-06 and the first 5 months of 06-07, $461 million more in Revenue has been collected than was originally appropriated.
…and not one dime has been returned to taxpayers in the form of a lower food tax.
|1 Comment | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
January 18, 2007
Stupid Idea
Terry Frank tells us that Stacey Campfield wants to get rid of the tax on food and replace it with a tax on porn. Now, I’m all for getting rid of the tax on food. Heck, I’m all for getting rid of taxes in general. But this is a stupid idea. It’s stupid for a few reasons but the main reason is that porn is free. It’s true. Ever since Al Gore gave us the Internet, porn has been free. It’s everywhere. You can even Google it up. And it’s piped into your home for free without having to go to the local porn store and, you know, run into your boss or something.
It’s also stupid because I doubt there’s enough volume of porn to compensate for the amount of groceries bought. So, Stacey, here’s an idea: Cut the tax on food and cut spending. Novel concept! Stacey writes:
The items I am considering are magazine’s, videos (online, cable purchase or hard copy) or items that you have to be over the age of 18 to view or purchase due to sexual content. R rated movies will not be included. Strip club fees and purchases of services at strip clubs and Escort services will also be included.
Aren’t escort services illegal if they involve sex? And today’s funny comes from the News Sentinel:
Kristi Dunn, store manager of Inserection Adult Fantasy Store, 501 N. Broadway, does not think the proposed tax will be of much concern to the store’s patrons.
Ha! That’s funny.
|3 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
January 16, 2007
15 Days
Damn. At least let the carcass that was Republican control get cold first:
On Thursday, the House of Representatives will vote on legislation to increase taxes for the first time since 1993. It took just 15 days of new found power for the Democrats to raise taxes. The first vote of the 110th Congress removed the 3/5 supermajority to raise taxes. The following day was a vote to enact a new rule requiring offsetting tax increases for every tax cut.
Yes, it’s all coming back to me now exactly why I hate those guys.
|2 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
December 01, 2006
That $0.40 you pay per gallon isn’t enough
You’ve got to be kidding:
Drivers could be paying their share of the state’s highway improvements based on how far they’re driving, under an idea being floated by some state legislators.
The system would work something like this: You pull up to a gas station, and a transmitter in your car tells the pump how far you’ve driven since you last filled your tank. The state charges you pennies for each mile you’ve traveled instead of the usual 21.4 cents per gallon you’ve been paying with every fill-up.
Members of the Senate Transportation Committee have been informally discussing the possibility of a “user fee” system, in which a Global Positioning System device would transmit your mileage to a gas pump and charge accordingly.
If you happen to be walking down the street and see a member of the Senate Transportation Committee, please kick him in the balls and tell him Uncle said that was ’cause you’re fucking stupid. If it happens to be a woman, the shin will do. Equal rights, and all. More:
“Gas tax revenues are static, and they don’t necessarily increase with the transportation needs that have to be met,” said Sen. Mark Norris, R-Collierville, chairman of the Senate Transportation Committee. “We need to look at more forward-thinking concepts … like doing away with the gas tax and going to a user-driven system.”
Mr. Norris, I propose instead we place a transmitter on legislators to measure how much time their head spends up their ass. Then, we tax them based on that amount of time. It seems you can just go ahead and sign over your wealth to the state. Here’s the deal, sparky:
People don’t like taxes. And people damn sure don’t like transmitters telling big brother where they are or how much they drive. It’s not forward-thinking, it’s creepy big-brother nonsense and it cannot stand. More still:
The state Department of Transportation faces a projected shortfall of about $2 billion in the next 10 years. Meanwhile, its take from the gas tax — 21.4 cents per gallon on regular and 18.4 cents on diesel — has been the same since 1989.
With that and the fed tax, Tennessee drivers pay about $0.40 per gallon in taxes. Remember that next time some lame politician is attacking big oil for jacking up gas prices.
Via MKS.
Update: Terry points out Mr. Norris, despite my prior complaint, is actually not retarded.
|17 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
November 09, 2006
Taxing
Congrats to Ben for his group’s victory:
Future property tax rate increases would have to go to the voters under a Metro Nashville referendum on Tuesday’s ballot.
Supporters of the ballot measure outnumbered opponents by a strong margin.
|3 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
November 07, 2006
Don’t mess with taxes
Via Ben, comes the carnival of taxes. Jeez, there’s a carnival for every thing. Soon, we’ll need a carnival of the carnivals.
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
October 18, 2006
Even liberals hate taxes
|3 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
October 13, 2006
What government does
I’m in business. Like most businesses, we sell stuff. Whenever you buy our stuff, we’ll take payments from you in, generally, any way you choose to get them to us. Check, cash, carrier pigeon, no problem. Hell, if you attached your cash to a brick and threw it through our window, we’d just consider the replacement window a valid business expense. We like getting your money. It’s why we’re here.
Not so with the .gov. I’m trying to pay taxes. Actually, I’m trying to pay estimated taxes. The won’t take my money. We’ve never paid these particular taxes to this particular bureaucracy before. They’re due Monday. Early last month, I filled out their form to authorize wire transfers. Due to a snafu on their end (i.e., Sorry sir, we, err, lost it) that didn’t go through and we’re looking at another 2 weeks. If I write them a check, they want to charge me a 10% penalty as opposed to if it’s just late and the penalty is interest, which is substantially less than 10%. I’m trying to pay you money. Jebus.
Idiots.
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
September 15, 2006
Sounds like a worthy cause to me
A new ad over there on the right says:
Congress is debating altering mortgage interest deductions, putting your homeownership at risk. Under U.S. tax code, mortgage interest on your home is currently deductible. If Congress changes or removes mortgage interest deductions you could be paying many thousands of dollars more each year.
Update: In comments, sailorcourt is unimpressed.
|10 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
August 31, 2006
Lawsuit awards not income
Ben says:
Last week, a federal appeals court ruled that certain types of court awards are NOT income…..so what? Well, the implications could be far reaching. The IRS has, like all bureaucracies with broad powers, assumed that they are pretty much in charge of determining what is “income.” The IRS has always pretty much taken the stance that if it shows up in your bank account, they get a piece of it. The court said, in effect, back off.
Specifically:
Murphy argued that just as compensation for physical injuries only makes one whole after a loss, the same is true of awards for emotional distress. In short, it is not income within the meaning of the 16th Amendment to the Constitution. The appeals court agreed, ruling that Murphy’s award for emotional distress is not income and therefore not taxable.
|2 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
August 29, 2006
Well, everyone should get out of New Jersey
Ben:
“The quality of life is going down about as fast as taxes are going up,” said Kuendel, 50, of Atlantic Highlands (New Jersey). He and his wife are looking at houses in Delaware, where there is no sales tax, no income tax and property taxes are relatively low.
Wonder what the correlation between tax rate and U-Haul rentals is?
|7 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
August 26, 2006
It’s about time
Ben Cunningham of Tennessee Tax Revolt is blogging here. Good.
Via Terry.
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
July 26, 2006
Taxing Tubes
TN Tax Revolt emails:
STOP the Internet Access TAX
Senator Alexander is THE KEY vote in the Senate and needs to hear from us NOW or he will very likely vote against extending the Internet Tax Freedom Act. Every state will then be free to tax our internet access. We rarely have the opportunity to have this kind of leverage but we can actually stop internet access taxes if we call Senator Alexander TODAY. PLEASE HELP.
The Internet Tax Freedom Act is keeping our Internet Access Tax Free but it will EXPIRE next year. The Senate is considering a permanent extension THIS WEEK and Senator Alexander will vote to increase these taxes if he doesn’t hear from us.
PLEASE take just a moment to call Senator Alexander’s office:
Just tell the Senator’s staff, “My name is _name_ and I live in _city_ and I want my Internet access to be tax free. Please tell the Senator to vote YES on permanently extending the Internet Tax Freedom Act.”
You can reach him at:
Washington Office
302 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-4944
Fax: (202) 228-3398
|1 Comment | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
July 13, 2006
Working is a privilege
Because I Can:
The state legislature first says you can’t practice without getting a license, which of course is provided by the state and not an independent party. But the license isn’t free. You have to pay annually or semi-annually to keep it. But not only do you have to pay for your license, you have to pay an annual tax on it. Essentially the legislature found out that they had a list of people that are hostage to them because they work in their chosen profession at the discretion of the state. So they decided to pick their pockets for an extra little something. They make you get a license, then they make you pay tax on the license to keep it.
I’ve bitched about it before. Seems I don’t have a right to work.
Via AC.
|1 Comment | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
July 12, 2006
Illegal drug tax overturned
I’ve covered the Tennessee tax stamp on illegal drugs for a while. Via the five people who emailed this to me this morning, comes the Tennessean:
A Tennessee judge has ruled that a state law requiring drug dealers to pay taxes on their cocaine, marijuana and other illicit drugs is unconstitutional.
The ruling by Davidson County Chancellor Richard Dinkins bars the state from collecting $1.1 million from Jeremy Robbins, an East Tennessee man who was arrested on federal drug conspiracy charges and ordered to pay taxes on marijuana he is accused of illegally possessing.
But it could potentially cost the state much more if the decision is upheld by higher courts and interpreted as applying to the entire state.
Good. It was a stupid idea and now it’s just stupider. The purpose of the tax was to provide a means for law enforcement to enhance its coffers and this law allowed that by making it a tax issue. It also had the added benefit of completely disregarding due process of law before seizing assets. Sadly:
Last night, state officials said they would continue to enforce the tax, which has brought more than $2.7 million into state coffers since it went into effect in January 2005.
“They’re just turning a blind eye and a deaf ear to the opinion,” said James A. H. Bell, one of the Knoxville lawyers who brought the case on behalf of Robbins. He described the state’s attitude as “cavalier.”
The chancellor’s decision, handed down Monday, applies only to Robbins and, in any case, the state plans to appeal, said Sharon Curtis-Flair, spokeswoman for the state attorney general’s office.
If it’s unconstitutional, why does it apply only in one case? And this bit is scary:
Since 2005, state Department of Revenue officials have assessed $51 million in drug taxes owed, with the vast majority of the money going uncollected.
Very few people have actually bought the stamps. During the law’s first year, taxpayers spent $1,492 in stamps for illegal drugs.
That’s a lot of money. And people didn’t buy the stamps because 1) it’s fucking stupid and 2) the state made it unnecessarily difficult to do.
The court agreed with SayUncle’s due process findings:
“The court concludes that the manner in which the tax is assessed deprives taxpayers of due process and, to that extent, the statute is unconstitutional on its face,” the chancellor wrote.
He also found that levying the tax and charging someone with a crime was equivalent to double jeopardy because it punished the dealer twice for the same crime.
“(The) statute violates the double jeopardy provisions of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and … the Tennessee Constitution to the extent it may be employed against a dealer otherwise subject to state prosecution relating to the unauthorized substances subject to the tax proceeding.”
SayUncle: Like the courts, only faster.
Update: In comments, Xrlq says not so fast. Read it.
|8 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
May 19, 2006
Email campaign
Tennessee Tax Revolt emails:
Please act TODAY and Click HERE to EMAIL Governor Bredesen, Speaker Naifeh, Speaker Wilder, Senator Ramsey and Representative McMillan to tell them this is a Golden opportunity to reduce the Sales Tax on Groceries.
Urgent: PLEASE Email Governor Bredesen with the link below. Governor Bredesen and the Tennessee General Assembly will decide next week how to spend an unexpected $266.5 million surplus (Tennessee Taxpayer Overpayment). A very small part of this surplus can be used to make a huge difference by reducing the sales tax on groceries.
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
May 03, 2006
This again
Tom takes me to task for not demanding ways to cut spending for tax cuts I support, or something:
Nobody’s asking that you fall into the false dichotomy Uncle falsely attributes to us. That is to say, nobody says you must favor all taxes and spending, or that you must oppose all taxes and spending. What you must do, however, is at least make an effort to bring taxes and spending into balance, and you cannot put the cart before the horse in doing this.
Err, no. Actually, there is no requirement I do that. End of story. I can say something sucks and not offer an alternative. For example, abortion sucks but I have no better alternative. And neither do you. Period. Game over.
See, here’s the problem: the anti-tax crowd knows that it’s easy to get sympathy from people by railing against the “evils” of taxation and, at least in the general sense, of “excessive government.” The problem is, as soon as these folks start drilling down into the particulars (e.g., what specific programs would be cut in order to bring down spending and thus lower taxes), they lose. And they know this, so they expressly avoid drilling into the particulars. When pushed, they’ll gladly give a laundry list of those spending programs they oppose, and these programs generally fall into either of two categories: programs that are too small to make a noticeable difference (e.g., some half-million dollar local pork program), or programs that are wildly popular (e.g. Social Security and Medicare). But they never explain how they’re actually going to get the voting public to agree to such program cuts (because they can’t), much less how they’d actually implement them.
I was pretty particular when I said killing social security and almost any agency that starts with Department of. Tom apparently thinks I’m a politician. I am not and have no desire to become so. Therefore, there is no need for me to pander to any demographic to score votes. I’m not trying to convince the voting public. Just because something is popular, that doesn’t make it right or wrong.
When taxes and the programs they pay for are directly tied together, most people prefer to pay the tax and keep the program, rather than to lose the program and be spared the tax.
I think that depends on the program. The military budget would get more support than, say, international assistance.
Getting the types of tax cuts that they favor would require either cutting these large-but-popular programs, which simply isn’t going to happen
On that, I agree. But I’m not pandering to voters or popularity contests. Our politicians are and that is why the .gov is the leviathan it is today. They can take on person’s money and give it to someone else.
Bringing this back around to Uncle, this is why we find his position so frustrating and so irresponsible. It’s not that he supports reducing taxes but doesn’t support reducing spending. It’s that he (apparently, at least) supports reducing and eliminating various taxes even if spending isn’t cut to match, and even if doing so wrecks the budget and/or explodes the debt. In other words, it may be an overstatement to say that he doesn’t care at all whether or not the government is fiscally responsible, but it’s certainly fair to say that his aversion to taxation is more important to him than any sort of budget discipline or financial responsibility. If he can’t get the spending cuts he wants, he still advocates cutting taxes anyway. Maybe he’ll close his eyes, clap three times, and hope it all works out.
Well, that shit’s just made up. I support cutting all kinds of taxes and all kinds of spending. But to kill the leviathan, you have to cut off it’s food not it’s fingernails.
At the same time, the .gov does provide valuable services, such as roads and the fact I don’t currently speak Russian. Those items, I don’t mind paying for though some scrutiny is needed in those areas (particularly defense spending which is always very high). But telling me that taxes are all groovy and shit because they only waste a little bit when compared to the total they waste isn’t very convincing.
Ed note: This started out as a comment over there but since my blogging is light, I thought I’d put it here for you to read.
|40 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
April 30, 2006
No more sales tax deduction?
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
April 29, 2006
Unclear on the concept
Kevin tries to take me to task with the strawman. See, when I express opposition to some random tax (of which there are thousands), I am also required by, err, I dunno what to come up with a way to pay for crap that might otherwise be funded by the taxes I oppose. In other words, I should be glad to be taxed and thankful for our infrastructure. Or damn the taxes and the infrastructure. What Kevin doesn’t seem to grasp is that I oppose taxes only slightly more than I oppose a bunch of crap the .gov wastes money on. So, yes, kill a bunch of it. I could write a list and it would basically include most things that start with Department of, social security and a great many more. But there are things they do that I support. There is a potential for balance but we’re tilted in the wrong direction.
He also states a real boner, that taxes are flat.
|8 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
April 14, 2006
Happy tax day, suckers
The IRS has a present for you:
The Internal Revenue Service is quietly moving to loosen the once-inviolable privacy of federal income-tax returns.
If it succeeds, accountants and other tax-return preparers for the first time would be able to sell information from individual returns — or even entire returns — to marketers and data brokers.
Via PTH.
|1 Comment | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
March 30, 2006
Tennessee Tax Revolt Taxpayer Information Center
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
February 24, 2006
No property tax on software
Michael Silence brings us some good news:
Businesses shouldn’t have to pay property tax on their computer software, an administrative law judge ruled.
The order came last week from administrative judge Pete Loesch in a case filed by Nashville-based American Healthways Inc., challenging an attempt by the Davidson County assessor to include computer applications on a personal property tax schedule.
There was a push recently to get a law that taxed software into effect. Last I heard, it was stopped.
|Comments Off | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
February 13, 2006
Tax time
Been doing my taxes. I hate it. Going on three hours now. Then it occurred to me. Since the .gov has such broad authority despite my right to abortion err privacy to poke around willy nilly in my financial dealings, my various financial institutions are obligated by law to report when I do something out of the ordinary, and all my wage info is sent automatically to the .gov via payroll providers, why don’t they just go ahead and do my taxes for me?
Seriously. Hell, if my privacy can be violated like that, why not get some benefit from it?
|10 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
January 24, 2006
Disregarding due process is profitable
Michael Silence notes:
Tennessee’s tax on unauthorized substances such as cocaine and marijuana and some alcoholic beverages brought in more than $1.7 million in its first year, according to revenue officials.
The tax, which is modeled after a 13-year-old North Carolina tax aimed at fighting illegal drugs, has resulted in $1,714,565 in collections and nearly $32 million in assessments.
“Our effective implementation of this tax aids in fulfilling the law’s primary purpose to channel funds collected into local law enforcement agencies to help combat, prevent and reduce drug crimes in Tennessee,” said Tennessee Department of Revenue Commissioner Loren L. Chumley.
Boy, is my face red. See, I predicted the tax would make no money. More:
With the tax, people in possession of illegal drugs must purchase stamps marked with a number to be affixed to packages containing the drugs.
When drugs without the stamp are found, the Tennessee Department of Revenue taxes the alleged drug possessor and gives them an opportunity to pay the tax. If it is not paid, agents may seize and auction anything of value the person owns.
No criminal conviction is needed for the state to enforce the tax, and information obtained from the sale of the drug stamps cannot be used in criminal prosecutions, according to the Revenue Department. At the same time, buying drug stamps does not provide immunity from criminal prosecution.
Oh, never mind. My face isn’t red at all. The purpose of the law was to get rid of due process in drug cases and it did just that, like I said.
|1 Comment | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
January 05, 2006
Software Taxes
Adrian reports that Tennessee is looking to tax software as property. That’s a good way to encourage growth in technical fields. As Adrian points out, most licenses allow usage and not ownership. After you drop some big bucks on a new enterprise resource system, you’ll be comforted to know you’ll be paying taxes on it for years. I’ve known a few companies that have pulled up operations in California and moved to Nevada because the taxes on inventory were too high.
|10 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
December 26, 2005
Pushing for the income tax?
Tennessee’s sales tax in the news:
When Julie Abel goes grocery shopping each week, she drives more than 25 miles to Georgia to avoid paying the nation’s highest average tax on food: 8.4 percent in Tennessee.
“If you can save $5 it is worth driving down the road,” Abel said after traveling from her rural home in Hamilton County, which collects 2.22 percent sales tax on food on top of the 6 percent for the state. Georgia does not tax food sales.
Abel is not alone in her frustration. Rep. Michael Kernell, D-Memphis, said he regularly hears complaints about the state’s almost 60-year-old food tax and he predicted it would change.
I don’t know that the numbers are accurate as our sales tax is 9.5% but 8.5% on some food and not others but the breakdown is arbitrary and the new sales tax laws have not been in effect for 60 years. Still, driving across a state line to buy food isn’t a bad idea. More:
An “average family of four could eat for free from Thanksgiving to Christmas on the tax they pay on food in a year,” Daly said.
A recent report from Daly’s group shows Tennessee leads the nation with the highest average sales tax on food, 8.4 percent, and a 9.4 percent sales tax.
Tennessee is among nine states that either have no state income tax, or collect it on dividend and interest income. Some say a state income tax could help ease the burden of the tax on food.
And there’s the pitch. Bredesen says he won’t support it and that’s why I voted for him.
|11 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |
November 29, 2005
Yeah, right
This will go over about as well as a request to ask someone to hit themselves in the head repeatedly with a hammer:
The Tennessee Department of Revenue is encouraging online retailers to begin collecting sales tax for the state two years ahead of the deadline for them to do so.
The state delayed implementation of the streamlined sales tax initiative until 2007 after retailers complained about increased paperwork. Nevertheless, a multistate agreement to move to the system took effect in October, and retailers are being reminded of that.
Encouraging? Unless you’re mandating it, it’s not going to happen. No one wants to pay the tax (well, I’m sure some folks do but smart people don’t). No one wants to do the additional bookkeeping for the tax. And wasn’t there some sort of congressional deal that put a moratorium on taxing internet sales? More:
The Streamlined Sales Tax Project is an agreement by 18 states to simplify sales tax laws by establishing a uniform system to administer and collect the taxes on nearly $3.5 trillion in retail transactions annually. The idea is to collect sales taxes based on where the buyer lives, rather than on the place of sale.
Always with the hands in the pockets. Feh. And, since I’m known to pick a nit or two, this is a stupid statement that I see all the time:
University of Tennessee economist William Fox issued a recent study estimating that state and local governments will lose $18 billion in sales tax revenues this year because of online purchases.
Stupid economists. If expense is greater than revenue, that is a loss. Not collecting money that you’re not entitled to is not a loss. It’s called not collecting money you’re not entitled to.
Apparently, major retailers aren’t gearing up for it because most states haven’t agreed yet. I think a good plan of attack would be opposition to states contemplating signing the agreement.
The internet wants to be free and we should let it.
|17 Comments | Link to this post | By SayUncle |