In Fast and Furious news
Policeman has illegal machine gun. He gets probation. It was a department gun and they cite ATF bureaucracy.
Because they suck at flying them. Well, they can’t interpret gun laws very well either and they’re still doing that.
I recently got
me err the kids a quadcopter and they are hard to fly.
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Director B. Todd Jones has informed Attorney General Eric Holder he plans to resign, effective March 31. Jones has secured a new job in the private sector in New York City, and may be joining a professional sports league, ABC News was told.
Rumors the ATF director is heading to the NFL. Well, I’ve almost completely stopped watching pro football. If this happens, I will completely.
Well, they have an agenda and all but you’d think they’d know about the firearms they’re in charge of regulating.
Congressional Democrats are pressuring the Obama administration to move ahead “swiftly” with a proposal that would ban a form of armor-piercing ammunition.
In a draft letter first obtained by The Hill, Democrats are urging the director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to use his “existing authority” to keep “dangerous ammunition out of our communities.”
“We hope that the Bureau will swiftly review comments on the proposed framework and issue a revised proposal that will address the danger posed by handguns that fire 5.56mm and other rifle ammunition,” Democrats write in the letter.
ATF Director: “Any 5.56 round” is “a challenge for officer safety,”
A bill stripping ATF of their ability to regulate ammo sounds better and better.
Well, for now:
Under intense pressure from majorities in the House and Senate, the National Rifle Association’s huge membership, the Obama administration has abruptly changed course and is rescinding its push to ban popular and cheap ammo used by AR-15 owners.
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives said 80,000 comments rolled in, many against the proposal to ban the 5.56 M855 “green tip” ammo. The NRA and the other groups still plan to flood ATF mailboxes with opposition letters just to make sure they go through with their withdrawal.
Maybe the congress critters threatened funding. Good. But keep an eye out. They’ll try to sneak it in at some point.
Yeah, our Regulation Guide saying ATF has already banned green tip, we didn’t mean it and we meant to follow the law:
Media reports have noted that the 2014 ATF Regulation Guide published online does not contain a listing of the exemptions for Armor Piercing Ammunition, and concluding that the absence of this listing indicates these exemptions have been rescinded.
Please be advised that ATF has not rescinded any Armor Piercing Ammunition exemption, and the fact they are not listed in the 2014 online edition of the regulations, was an error, which has no legal impact on the validity of the exemptions. The existing exemptions for armor piercing ammunition, which apply to 5.56 mm (.223) SS 109 and M855 projectiles (identified by a green coating on the projectile tip), and the U.S .30-06 M2AP projectile (identified by a black coating on the projectile tip), remain in effect.
The listing of Armor Piercing Ammunition exemptions can be found in the 2005 ATF Regulation Guide on page 166, which is posted here.
The 2014 Regulation Guide will be corrected in PDF format to include the listing of Armor Piercing Ammunition exemptions and posted shortly. The e-book/iBook version of the Regulation Guide will be corrected in the near future. ATF apologizes for any confusion caused by this publishing error.
At least, according to its latest Regulation Guide.
They’re just kind of making it up as they go. And by “it”, I mean the law.
“Any ammunition is of concern to police in the wrong hands, but this specific round has historically not posed a law enforcement problem,” said James Pasco, executive director of the Washington office of the Fraternal Order of Police, the world’s largest organization of sworn law enforcement officers, with more than 325,000 members.
ATF is moving ahead with it’s ban on M855 ammo. People are upset about it (btw, what is a gun user?)
White House Minister of Truth Josh Earnest (whose very name is an oxymoron) has said that this ban would save police lives. I wonder how many police have been shot with M855?
This may backfire on ATF and the administration as a bill has been introduced in congress to roll back ATF’s ability to regulate ammo.
Use of a buffer tube on an AK-type firearm that has no use for such an item may be evidence that the weapon is intended to be fired from the shoulder. Therefore, adding a buffer tube to an AK-type pistol, where the barrel is less than 16 inches in length, would result in the manufacture of a “firearm” as defined in 5845(a)(3). However, if an AK-type pistol were to utilize an AR-type buffer tube to facilitate the attachment of a (sic) SB-15 stabilizing brace accessory, a “firearm” as defined in 5845(a)(3) would not be made and consequently lawful to possess.
This SB-15 business is getting silly.
A quick glance at the Federal Register (Vol. 80, No. 37, p. 9987-88) today reveals that Attorney General Eric Holder, who earned cautious praise last month for a small reform to the federal equitable sharing program, has now delegated authority to the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) to seize and “administratively forfeit” property involved in suspected drug offenses. Holder temporarily delegated this authority to the ATF on a trial basis in 2013, and today made the delegation permanent while lauding the ATF for seizing more than $19.3 million from Americans during the trial period.
Historically, when the ATF uncovered contraband subject to forfeiture under drug statutes, it was required to either refer the property to the DEA for administrative forfeiture proceedings or to a U.S. Attorney in order to initiate a judicial forfeiture action. Under today’s change, the ATF will now be authorized to seize property related to alleged drug offenses and initiate administrative forfeiture proceedings all on its own.
So reports guns.com. My guess is this video (skip to 1:50) doesn’t help Sig’s case:
The entire “armor piercing” ammo law was based on a lie, and if the left really wants to see the shooting sports get greener, shouldn’t they agree to let us make, sell, and acquire ammunition with steel cores and other materials that make good and reasonable substitutes for lead? We can call it the “Green Ammunition Act of 2016.”
No law required. Just make regulations. This is why our government is broken and inherently anti-freedom.
Unelected bureaucrats making laws:
Some legal type guy does too.
Let’s get the obvious out of the way, it’s stupid. Saying that using it in a way other than intended “redesigns” is asinine. If I use the magazine well as a forward grip, I’m not redesigning it. Also, US Code defines a handgun:
(29) The term “handgun” means—
(A) a firearm which has a short stock and is designed to be held and fired by the use of a single hand;
I guess if you’re using two hands to shoot (like you fucking should), you’ve just redesigned your Glock.
My guess is what really happened is the first letter was approved without appropriate supervision; or they didn’t realize the can of worms they were opening.
As for what to do, I’m keeping mine as a collectors item. I imagine there probably won’t be many more made.
As for what to do legally, I dunno. Perhaps a class action suit against ATF for relying on their initial letter?
Once again rescinding a prior ruling, ATF says shouldering a brace redesigns something and is a no no
Update: The market has spoken.
Here’s a suppressor with picatinny rails on it. Odd. Would the addition of a forward grip make the firearm or the suppressor an AOW? Quick, ask the ATF.
A ruling that says you can’t let someone use your CNC machine or mill to make a gun. Seems to be targeting 80% lowers:
Held further, a business (including an association or society) may not avoid the manufacturing license, marking, and recordkeeping requirements of the GCA by allowing persons to perform manufacturing processes on blanks or incomplete firearms (including frames or receivers) using machinery, tools, or equipment under its dominion and control where that business controls access to, and use of, such machinery, tools, or equipment.
My understanding is that we all know it’s an SBR but we can’t call it that. Another determination letter.
NSFW!!! Hey, ATF, can you define shouldering? NSFW!!!
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills