<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No thanks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/04/29/no-thanks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/04/29/no-thanks/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/04/29/no-thanks/#comment-199469</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=15495#comment-199469</guid>
		<description>The NRA already has certificates for anything from safe handgun use to range safety officer to reloading etc.  I've taken some of their classes and they haven't hurt me any.  

I'm not against classes being available for people to learn safe gun handling.  One thing, among others, the article's author gets wrong is that those who need the class (criminals and idiots) won't take it and those who would take the class (the huge majority of law-abiding gunowners) don't need it.  Someone said something similar about gun locks, but I'm too lazy (and too much at work) to Google it.

Also, there's only one way I'd support any type of gun certifcation/licensing scheme, even if done privately.  Everyone, with no exceptions, has to earn a safe gun handling certificate or license that must be shown to buy a gun.  No record is kept of who purchases a gun.  That way, everyone is trained and there's no record of who actually owns guns.  Here's a plus, the anti's would actually have to shoot a gun for once in their lives.  Not going to happen, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NRA already has certificates for anything from safe handgun use to range safety officer to reloading etc.  I&#8217;ve taken some of their classes and they haven&#8217;t hurt me any.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not against classes being available for people to learn safe gun handling.  One thing, among others, the article&#8217;s author gets wrong is that those who need the class (criminals and idiots) won&#8217;t take it and those who would take the class (the huge majority of law-abiding gunowners) don&#8217;t need it.  Someone said something similar about gun locks, but I&#8217;m too lazy (and too much at work) to Google it.</p>
<p>Also, there&#8217;s only one way I&#8217;d support any type of gun certifcation/licensing scheme, even if done privately.  Everyone, with no exceptions, has to earn a safe gun handling certificate or license that must be shown to buy a gun.  No record is kept of who purchases a gun.  That way, everyone is trained and there&#8217;s no record of who actually owns guns.  Here&#8217;s a plus, the anti&#8217;s would actually have to shoot a gun for once in their lives.  Not going to happen, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/04/29/no-thanks/#comment-199460</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=15495#comment-199460</guid>
		<description>I have a PADI scuba license...

It took me 2 days to get, at a cost of about $200.  No background check or law enforcement involvement was required.
It's good everywhere... worldwide.  
It never expires, good until I die, with no renewal required.
No records are kept of when or where I dive, what equipment I purchase, there's no limits on what I can buy and sell, how often, or how much.
I can build my own scuba gear.
A 12 year old can get a permit, with parental consent.
A 18 year old no longer needs parental consent.

I suppose I could live with that compromise, though it violates the 2nd amendment.  At least it does so far less than the millions of restrictions placed on our rights today!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a PADI scuba license&#8230;</p>
<p>It took me 2 days to get, at a cost of about $200.  No background check or law enforcement involvement was required.<br />
It&#8217;s good everywhere&#8230; worldwide.<br />
It never expires, good until I die, with no renewal required.<br />
No records are kept of when or where I dive, what equipment I purchase, there&#8217;s no limits on what I can buy and sell, how often, or how much.<br />
I can build my own scuba gear.<br />
A 12 year old can get a permit, with parental consent.<br />
A 18 year old no longer needs parental consent.</p>
<p>I suppose I could live with that compromise, though it violates the 2nd amendment.  At least it does so far less than the millions of restrictions placed on our rights today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/04/29/no-thanks/#comment-199448</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=15495#comment-199448</guid>
		<description>Oh, wow, what a useful suggestion.  Considering the lies, propaganda, bias, and irresponsible stories printed EVERY DAY, I have a great idea for them.
  "You go first".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, wow, what a useful suggestion.  Considering the lies, propaganda, bias, and irresponsible stories printed EVERY DAY, I have a great idea for them.<br />
  &#8220;You go first&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
