Comments on: On gun laws that are dumb http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/06/25/on_gun_laws_that_are_dumb-3/ Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you. Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:35:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Sebastian-PGP http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/06/25/on_gun_laws_that_are_dumb-3/#comment-174383 Sebastian-PGP Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:28:37 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/06/25/on_gun_laws_that_are_dumb-3/#comment-174383 Ron pretty much nailed it. The idea that you guns aren't already properly stored and cared for by having them locked in your own goddamn house behind closed doors is offensive. Let's be frank--the person at fault when guns are stolen is the THIEF, not the gun owner. Any suggestion to the contrary is anti-freedom thinking at its worst. Ron pretty much nailed it.

The idea that you guns aren’t already properly stored and cared for by having them locked in your own goddamn house behind closed doors is offensive.

Let’s be frank–the person at fault when guns are stolen is the THIEF, not the gun owner. Any suggestion to the contrary is anti-freedom thinking at its worst.

]]> By: Ron W http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/06/25/on_gun_laws_that_are_dumb-3/#comment-174379 Ron W Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:14:53 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/06/25/on_gun_laws_that_are_dumb-3/#comment-174379 Such laws are obviously aimed (no pun intended) at forcing the law-abiding citizens to disarm themselves. This is tyranny using the slower and gradual approach and naive "useful idiots" to achieve its evil. Such laws are obviously aimed (no pun intended) at forcing the law-abiding citizens to disarm themselves. This is tyranny using the slower and gradual approach and naive “useful idiots” to achieve its evil.

]]> By: Sebastian http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/06/25/on_gun_laws_that_are_dumb-3/#comment-174366 Sebastian Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:53:00 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/06/25/on_gun_laws_that_are_dumb-3/#comment-174366 I was all ready to correct Bitter on the matter of law since it says after "discovery" rather than after the incident, so that you wouldn't need to actually conduct inventories, but after reading the actual law, no, it really could be that bad. It's ripe for prosecutorial abuse by any DA that decides he doesn't like a gun owner who had a gun stolen. I was all ready to correct Bitter on the matter of law since it says after “discovery” rather than after the incident, so that you wouldn’t need to actually conduct inventories, but after reading the actual law, no, it really could be that bad. It’s ripe for prosecutorial abuse by any DA that decides he doesn’t like a gun owner who had a gun stolen.

]]>