<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: H.R. 1791: Fairness in Firearms Testing Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/04/02/hr_1791_fairness_in_firearms_testing_act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/04/02/hr_1791_fairness_in_firearms_testing_act/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: A bill: H.R. 1791 at Standard Mischief</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/04/02/hr_1791_fairness_in_firearms_testing_act/#comment-171255</link>
		<dc:creator>A bill: H.R. 1791 at Standard Mischief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 03:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/04/02/hr_1791_fairness_in_firearms_testing_act/#comment-171255</guid>
		<description>[...] Uncle talks about a badly needed BATFE reform:  H.R. 1791 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Uncle talks about a badly needed BATFE reform:  H.R. 1791 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markm</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/04/02/hr_1791_fairness_in_firearms_testing_act/#comment-168459</link>
		<dc:creator>markm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/04/02/hr_1791_fairness_in_firearms_testing_act/#comment-168459</guid>
		<description>Will you get rid of federal alcohol and tobacco taxes too? Collecting those was the original purpose of this agency. I'm not sure whether firearms were tacked on because...

1) Congress couldn't think of where else to stick enforcement of the NFA,

2) Congress knew the $200 NFA "fee" was really a tax, and here's a tax-collecting agency,

3) or, in 1934 the "revenooers" were the only federal agents that had much experience with guns...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will you get rid of federal alcohol and tobacco taxes too? Collecting those was the original purpose of this agency. I&#8217;m not sure whether firearms were tacked on because&#8230;</p>
<p>1) Congress couldn&#8217;t think of where else to stick enforcement of the NFA,</p>
<p>2) Congress knew the $200 NFA &#8220;fee&#8221; was really a tax, and here&#8217;s a tax-collecting agency,</p>
<p>3) or, in 1934 the &#8220;revenooers&#8221; were the only federal agents that had much experience with guns&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: straightarrow</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/04/02/hr_1791_fairness_in_firearms_testing_act/#comment-168421</link>
		<dc:creator>straightarrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 04:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/04/02/hr_1791_fairness_in_firearms_testing_act/#comment-168421</guid>
		<description>Magus, a better fix; get rid of the  BATFE and incarcerate all its employees for conspiracy to deny civil right to all Americans.  ALL!  From the top dog to the janitor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Magus, a better fix; get rid of the  BATFE and incarcerate all its employees for conspiracy to deny civil right to all Americans.  ALL!  From the top dog to the janitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magus</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/04/02/hr_1791_fairness_in_firearms_testing_act/#comment-168420</link>
		<dc:creator>Magus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 02:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/04/02/hr_1791_fairness_in_firearms_testing_act/#comment-168420</guid>
		<description>Easy fix. Delete the F from the ATF and also get rid of the pre-86 requirement on full autos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easy fix. Delete the F from the ATF and also get rid of the pre-86 requirement on full autos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Bastard</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/04/02/hr_1791_fairness_in_firearms_testing_act/#comment-168407</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Bastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/04/02/hr_1791_fairness_in_firearms_testing_act/#comment-168407</guid>
		<description>"firing out of batter" ?

Get back into the batter. Cook up good, and GET INTO MY BELLY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;firing out of batter&#8221; ?</p>
<p>Get back into the batter. Cook up good, and GET INTO MY BELLY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/04/02/hr_1791_fairness_in_firearms_testing_act/#comment-168400</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/04/02/hr_1791_fairness_in_firearms_testing_act/#comment-168400</guid>
		<description>With an amendment that allows any Standard English Language usage to be used on any ATF form.  That would include your abbreviations.  If fact, check that.  How about dumping the forms all together and just going with the NICS check.  If they pass that, they get the gun.  Reduce paperwork.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With an amendment that allows any Standard English Language usage to be used on any ATF form.  That would include your abbreviations.  If fact, check that.  How about dumping the forms all together and just going with the NICS check.  If they pass that, they get the gun.  Reduce paperwork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
