What he said
Furthermore, the Brady Campaign seems to be saying that, since they believe the entire concept of the ‘milita’ is an anachronism, we are permitted to ignore the Second Amendment. Setting aside the obvious fact that the militia clause does not, textually, restrain the individual right laid out in the Second Amendment, the Brady Campaign is actually itself ignoring the milita clause because of their belief that it is outdated. This is surely impermissible. If I think free speech is outmoded, that doesn’t make for a legitmate constitutional argument that the First Amendment is irrelevant. (sic)
Yup. Read the whole thing.
