Ammo For Sale

« « Take the 3D AR challenge | Home | Gun Porn » »

Cody Wilson on CBS

This is pretty awesome. The segment near the end with Cody Wilson was gold. He basically told the pearl-clutching news guy “because fuck you that’s why” in a reasonably polite way:

16 Responses to “Cody Wilson on CBS”

  1. HL Says:

    I love how they lie and say you can make an AR with a GG. No, you can make an AR stripped lower.

    Not that it matters…if it spat complete guns out, it wouldn’t change my mind.

  2. Ron W Says:

    The neo liberals (authoritarians) want to conserve a monopoly of violence in the hands of the government and the wealthy elite who can hire private armed security. They are the ones who have exempted themselves from the laws they want to impose on the common people. Otherwise they will claim to be for “civil liberties”, except when keeping for themselves what they want denied to others. Then they will trample the 1st Amendment, the 4th Amendment or the 5th Amendment.

  3. Dean Weingarten Says:

    Cody Wilson is educating the ignorant leftists about reality.

    This is a good thing.

    3D firearms is simply a way to educate the ignorant left. It changes very little.

  4. Remington 700 Shooter Says:

    Cody Wilson is doing a great job explaining why 3d printed firearms are important.

  5. MAJMike Says:

    IMO Ron W. wins the thread. Everything needed to be said was stated in his post. Well done.

  6. Ron W Says:

    Thanks, MAJMike.

  7. Ellen Says:

    The gun-banners keep saying plastic guns are undetectable. They might even be right. But bullets are made out of metal, thank you, and so are most cartridges. A plastic gun is useless without bullets. Banners shriek about something impossible, just to bolster their case.

  8. Lyle Says:

    People have been making their own guns since the invention of the gun. Nothing has changed.

    This is an excellent example of the authoritarians always telling us “times have changed”, meaning that your rights are no longer valid, or that “the new situation” requires a revising of your rights.

    Nor does one need blueprints to make a gun. The gun itself is the blueprint. Observe, understand it’s function, measure and copy. The issue of whether a gun is produced on a 3D printer or on a CNC milling machine, or by hand using casting, hammers, grinders and files, is irrelevant, but THEY WANT YOU TO BELIEVE THERE IS A DIFFERENCE, AND MANY PEOPLE WILL FALL FOR THE LIE.

  9. Patrick Says:

    He took the right approach. We’ve always explained the details, and frankly that is what I once would have done: explain what a “lower” is, and why you cannot 3D print or home-mill a barrel in his milling machine.

    I realized a while ago that this just sounds like vacillation and excuse-making. Cody’s (and Uncle’s) approach – “because fuck you” is the one we need to use more often. They don’t care what we say and we need to stop caring what they say, in return.

    This is going to be a numbers game. Every person we introduce to the right pays bigger dividends – in the long run – for us than Bloomberg’s dollars do for the other side. Bloomberg’s money cannot make gun control fun.

  10. Lyle Says:

    @Ellen; are you saying that, let’s say, a Teflon-coated, ceramic bullet, for example, in a plastic case in un-makable? I beg to differ (don’t make me prove it) but of course none of this touches on the point, that people have God-given rights, recognized and asserted in our constitution, that there is no true authority that can say otherwise (only threat of force).

    To lampoon the assertion by the authoritarians that “the founders could never have imagined…”;
    In the founders’ time, all guns were “undetectable” in the same sense that an all-plastic gun with non-metallic ammunition would be “undetectable” today. Therefore an entirely “undetectable” gun with “undetectable” ammunition would merely be putting us into the founders’ situation.

    Since when did it become axiomatic that your exercise of your right to keep and bear arms must be “detectable” by the the government “authorities” which hate that right? Hmm? Fuck that, I say, and all who fall for that stupid trick.

  11. rickn8or Says:

    “Since when did it become axiomatic that your exercise of your right to keep and bear arms must be “detectable” by the the government “authorities” which hate that right?”

    I’m more curious about how someone carrying a weapon for their personal defense without a government-issued permission slip became a crime.

  12. Ron W Says:

    “I’m more curious about how someone carrying a weapon for their personal defense without a government-issued permission slip became a crime.” –rickn8or

    By Electing people who have no respect for authority, that is, the delegated powers UNDER which they shall serve NOT violating our declared rights. If one is going to be in authority, he or she must be under authority. Not doing so is the criminal action.

  13. Lyle Says:

    “If one is going to be in authority, he or she must be under authority.”

    Authoritarians will scoff at that. The higher authority mentioned in the Declaration, from which our rights are derived, is God, and they recognize only their own, counterfeit “authority”.

    And so it comes down to that; God’s authority in contrast to various and sundry counterfeits. That’s our problem; few wish to acknowledge that simple contrast and will therefore cling to any other (false) dichotomy. Conflict and strife is the only possible outcome. Most of those few who understand this are on the wrong side (oh, they understand), and they are the ones who rule the world. Thus we are screwed.

  14. JTC Says:

    Beyond the interesting tech in its infancy and the correct response of BFYTW to anyone questioning it, is the fact that what we have right here right now is a squirrel…look!

    And as said squirrel occupies and deflects the pea brains of said questioners, the National Private Arsenal continues to add inventory and availability of very serviceable firearms which can be had by the dozen for the price of a GG. And might I add that while there are “numbers” attached, they are irrelevant in the NPA, serving the purpose of record-keeping to purchasers, but none at all to dotgov or any of its wannabe agents and acolytes.

  15. Ron W Says:

    Yes, Lyle, you’re correct. And the authority flows from God to the People and then to delegated powers down to the government.

  16. Fűz Says:

    “If one is going to be in authority, he or she must be under authority.”
    Ron W won the thread again.

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local
Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges


bisonAd

Categories

Archives